These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

431 related items for PubMed ID: 29453902

  • 1. Peri-operative outcomes and complications after laparoscopic vs robot-assisted dismembered pyeloplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Light A, Karthikeyan S, Maruthan S, Elhage O, Danuser H, Dasgupta P.
    BJU Int; 2018 Aug; 122(2):181-194. PubMed ID: 29453902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: effect on operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and success rate.
    Braga LH, Pace K, DeMaria J, Lorenzo AJ.
    Eur Urol; 2009 Nov; 56(5):848-57. PubMed ID: 19359084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Meta-analysis of robot-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in children.
    Cundy TP, Harling L, Hughes-Hallett A, Mayer EK, Najmaldin AS, Athanasiou T, Yang GZ, Darzi A.
    BJU Int; 2014 Oct; 114(4):582-94. PubMed ID: 25383399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. One- vs 4-week stent placement after laparoscopic and robot-assisted pyeloplasty: results of a prospective randomised single-centre study.
    Danuser H, Germann C, Pelzer N, Rühle A, Stucki P, Mattei A.
    BJU Int; 2014 Jun; 113(6):931-5. PubMed ID: 24472002
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): technical considerations and results.
    Esposito C, Masieri L, Castagnetti M, Sforza S, Farina A, Cerulo M, Cini C, Del Conte F, Escolino M.
    J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Dec; 15(6):667.e1-667.e8. PubMed ID: 31734119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pediatric Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty.
    Greenwald D, Mohanty A, Andolfi C, Gundeti MS.
    J Endourol; 2022 Apr; 36(4):448-461. PubMed ID: 34806401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants and children: is it superior to conventional laparoscopy?
    Andolfi C, Adamic B, Oommen J, Gundeti MS.
    World J Urol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):1827-1833. PubMed ID: 31506749
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.