These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

165 related items for PubMed ID: 29455849

  • 1. Relationship Between Proximal Aorta Morphology and Progression Rate of Aortic Stenosis.
    Capoulade R, Teoh JG, Bartko PE, Teo E, Scholtz JE, Tastet L, Shen M, Mihos CG, Park YH, Garcia J, Larose E, Isselbacher EM, Sundt TM, MacGillivray TE, Melnitchouk S, Ghoshhajra BB, Pibarot P, Hung J.
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2018 May; 31(5):561-569.e1. PubMed ID: 29455849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Anatomical features of the aortic root in aortic stenosis and a novel approach for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
    Tada N, Inoue T, Matsumoto T, Sakurai M, Mizutani Y, Enta Y, Ishii K, Inoue H, Taguri M, Hata M, Sakuma M, Toyoda S, Ootomo T.
    Heart Vessels; 2018 Aug; 33(8):908-917. PubMed ID: 29387924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The Sinotubular Junction-to-Aortic Annulus Ratio as a Determinant of Supravalvar Aortic Stenosis Severity.
    Gal DB, Lechich KM, Jensen HK, Millett PC, Bolin E, Daily J, Jack JT, Stephens S, Jensen MO, Collins RT.
    Am J Cardiol; 2022 Feb 01; 164():118-122. PubMed ID: 34815057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Aortic valve area, stroke volume, left ventricular hypertrophy, remodeling, and fibrosis in aortic stenosis assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between high and low gradient and normal and low flow aortic stenosis.
    Barone-Rochette G, Piérard S, Seldrum S, de Meester de Ravenstein C, Melchior J, Maes F, Pouleur AC, Vancraeynest D, Pasquet A, Vanoverschelde JL, Gerber BL.
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Nov 01; 6(6):1009-17. PubMed ID: 24100045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging-derived ascending aortic flow eccentricity and flow compression are linked to aneurysm morphology†.
    Kari FA, Kocher N, Beyersdorf F, Tscheuschler A, Meffert P, Rylski B, Siepe M, Russe MF, Hope MD.
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 May 01; 20(5):582-7; discussion 587-8. PubMed ID: 25636325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The sinotubular junction does not progressively dilate four years after modified subcoronary freestyle stentless tissue aortic valve replacement.
    Martin JW, Deeb GM, Bach DS.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Nov 01; 12(6):726-33. PubMed ID: 14658814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Value of ejection fraction/velocity ratio in the prognostic stratification of patients with asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis.
    Antonini-Canterin F, Di Nora C, Cervesato E, Zito C, Carerj S, Ravasel A, Cosei I, Popescu AC, Popescu BA.
    Echocardiography; 2018 Dec 01; 35(12):1909-1914. PubMed ID: 30376590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Blood flow competition after aortic valve bypass: an evaluation using computational fluid dynamics.
    Kawahito K, Kimura N, Komiya K, Nakamura M, Misawa Y.
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2017 May 01; 24(5):670-676. PubMed ID: 28453794
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Correlation of structural defects in the ascending aortic wall to ultrasound parameters: benefits for decision-making process in aortic valve surgery.
    Borović SD, Labudović Borović MM, Zaletel IV, Todorović VN, Dabić PA, Rakočević JT, Marinković-Erić JM, Milojević PS.
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 Jan 18; 13(1):12. PubMed ID: 29347958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Aortic valve replacement reduces valvuloarterial impedance but does not affect systemic arterial compliance in elderly men with degenerative calcific trileaflet aortic valve stenosis.
    Pagel PS, Schroeder AR, De Vry DJ, Hudetz JA.
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2014 Dec 18; 28(6):1540-4. PubMed ID: 25267695
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Clinical Significance of Ejection Dynamics Parameters in Patients with Aortic Stenosis: An Outcome Study.
    Ringle Griguer A, Tribouilloy C, Truffier A, Castel AL, Delelis F, Levy F, Vincentelli A, Bohbot Y, Maréchaux S.
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2018 May 18; 31(5):551-560.e2. PubMed ID: 29306545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Prognostic Value of Energy Loss Coefficient for Predicting Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis Outcomes: Direct Comparison With Aortic Valve Area.
    Yoshida H, Seo Y, Ishizu T, Izumo M, Akashi YJ, Yamashita E, Otsuji Y, Negishi K, Takeuchi M.
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2019 Mar 18; 32(3):351-358.e3. PubMed ID: 30638723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Outcome of Patients with Low-Flow/Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis Who Underwent Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Fan XL, Zhang J, Wang C, Chong H, Zhang G, Xue Q, Tang Y, Han L.
    Heart Surg Forum; 2017 Jul 20; 20(4):E124-E128. PubMed ID: 28846524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of severity of aortic regurgitation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus transthoracic echocardiography.
    Gabriel RS, Renapurkar R, Bolen MA, Verhaert D, Leiber M, Flamm SD, Griffin BP, Desai MY.
    Am J Cardiol; 2011 Oct 01; 108(7):1014-20. PubMed ID: 21784393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Different hemodynamic stress of the ascending aorta wall in patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve.
    Bauer M, Siniawski H, Pasic M, Schaumann B, Hetzer R.
    J Card Surg; 2006 Oct 01; 21(3):218-20. PubMed ID: 16684044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Aortic stenosis severity is not a risk factor for poststenotic dilatation of the ascending aorta.
    Linhartová K, Beránek V, Sefrna F, Hanisová I, Sterbáková G, Pesková M.
    Circ J; 2007 Jan 01; 71(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 17186983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Perioperative Hemodynamic Changes in the Thoracic Aorta in Patients With Aortic Valve Stenosis: A Prospective Serial 4D-Flow MRI Study.
    Kamada H, Ota H, Nakamura M, Imai Y, Ishida S, Sun W, Sakatsume K, Yoshioka I, Saiki Y, Takase K.
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Jan 01; 32(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 31323320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Catheterization-Doppler discrepancies in nonsimultaneous evaluations of aortic stenosis.
    Aghassi P, Aurigemma GP, Folland ED, Tighe DA.
    Echocardiography; 2005 May 01; 22(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 15901286
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Impact of flow and left ventricular strain on outcome of patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction and low gradient severe aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement.
    Kamperidis V, van Rosendael PJ, Ng AC, Katsanos S, van der Kley F, Debonnaire P, Joyce E, Sianos G, Marsan NA, Bax JJ, Delgado V.
    Am J Cardiol; 2014 Dec 15; 114(12):1875-81. PubMed ID: 25438916
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Biphasic Doppler pattern of the descending thoracic aorta: a new echocardiographic finding in patients with aortic valve stenosis.
    Hansen WH, Behrenbeck T, Spittell PC, Gilman G, Seward JB.
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2005 Aug 15; 18(8):860-4. PubMed ID: 16084339
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.