These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

364 related items for PubMed ID: 29467113

  • 1. Accuracy of the ADNEX MR scoring system based on a simplified MRI protocol for the assessment of adnexal masses.
    Pereira PN, Sarian LO, Yoshida A, Araújo KG, Barros RHO, Baião AC, Parente DB, Derchain S.
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2018; 24(2):63-71. PubMed ID: 29467113
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. External validation of the MR imaging scoring system for the management of adnexal masses.
    Ruiz M, Labauge P, Louboutin A, Limot O, Fauconnier A, Huchon C.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():115-9. PubMed ID: 27583370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Validity and Reproducibility of the ADNEX MR Scoring System in the Diagnosis of Sonographically Indeterminate Adnexal Masses.
    Basha MAA, Abdelrahman HM, Metwally MI, Alayouty NA, Mohey N, Zaitoun MMA, Almassry HN, Yousef HY, El Sammak AA, Aly SA, Algazzar HY, Farag MAEM, Mosallam W, Abo Shanab WS, Ibrahim SA, Mohamed EA, Mohamed AEM, Afifi AHM, Harb OA, Azmy TM.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Jan; 53(1):292-304. PubMed ID: 32715577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Diagnostic Accuracies of the Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging ADNEX Scoring Systems For Ovarian Adnexal Mass: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Cui L, Xu H, Zhang Y.
    Acad Radiol; 2022 Jun; 29(6):897-908. PubMed ID: 34217614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Pattern Recognition or Adnexal MR Scoring System: Which Is More Accurate in Evaluating Adnexal Lesions?
    Malek M, Hosseini A, Moradi B, Rahmani M, Aghasi M, Akhavan S, Ahmadinejad N, Abdolghafoorian H.
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2024 Apr 01; 25(4):1265-1270. PubMed ID: 38679986
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Adnexal masses: development and preliminary validation of an MR imaging scoring system.
    Thomassin-Naggara I, Aubert E, Rockall A, Jalaguier-Coudray A, Rouzier R, Daraï E, Bazot M.
    Radiology; 2013 May 01; 267(2):432-43. PubMed ID: 23468574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. External validation of ADNEX MR SCORING system: a single-centre retrospective study.
    Sasaguri K, Yamaguchi K, Nakazono T, Mizuguchi M, Aishima S, Yokoyama M, Irie H.
    Clin Radiol; 2019 Feb 01; 74(2):131-139. PubMed ID: 30514585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods.
    Meys EMJ, Jeelof LS, Achten NMJ, Slangen BFM, Lambrechts S, Kruitwagen RFPM, Van Gorp T.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun 01; 49(6):784-792. PubMed ID: 27514486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparative Study of the Efficacy of the Ovarian-Adnexa Reporting and Data System Ultrasound Combined With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and the ADNEX MR Scoring System in the Diagnosis of Adnexal Masses.
    Wang T, Cui W, Nie F, Huang X, Huang L, Liu L, Zhu Y, Zheng R.
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2023 Sep 01; 49(9):2072-2080. PubMed ID: 37321953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Validation of ADNEX and IOTA two-step strategy and estimation of risk of complications during follow-up of adnexal masses in low-risk population.
    Pascual MA, Vancraeynest L, Timmerman S, Ceusters J, Ledger A, Graupera B, Rodriguez I, Valero B, Landolfo C, Testa AC, Bourne T, Timmerman D, Valentin L, Van Calster B, Froyman W.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Sep 01; 64(3):395-404. PubMed ID: 38477179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Performance of IOTA ADNEX model in evaluating adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center in China.
    Chen H, Qian L, Jiang M, Du Q, Yuan F, Feng W.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec 01; 54(6):815-822. PubMed ID: 31152572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Characterization of adnexal masses using feature analysis at contrast-enhanced helical computed tomography.
    Zhang J, Mironov S, Hricak H, Ishill NM, Moskowitz CS, Soslow RA, Chi DS.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008 Dec 01; 32(4):533-40. PubMed ID: 18664838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography-Based Risk Models in Differentiating Between Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors in a US Cohort.
    Yoeli-Bik R, Longman RE, Wroblewski K, Weigert M, Abramowicz JS, Lengyel E.
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jul 03; 6(7):e2323289. PubMed ID: 37440228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. O-RADS MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance and Category-wise Malignancy Rates.
    Rizzo S, Cozzi A, Dolciami M, Del Grande F, Scarano AL, Papadia A, Gui B, Gandolfo N, Catalano C, Manganaro L.
    Radiology; 2023 Apr 03; 307(1):e220795. PubMed ID: 36413127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Performance of the IOTA ADNEX model in preoperative discrimination of adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center.
    Araujo KG, Jales RM, Pereira PN, Yoshida A, de Angelo Andrade L, Sarian LO, Derchain S.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun 03; 49(6):778-783. PubMed ID: 27194129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Two-Step Strategy for Optimizing the Preoperative Classification of Adnexal Masses in a University Hospital, Using International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Models: Simple Rules and Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa Model.
    Esquivel Villabona AL, Rodríguez JN, Ayala N, Buriticá C, Gómez AC, Velandia AM, Rodríguez N, Alcázar JL.
    J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Feb 03; 41(2):471-482. PubMed ID: 33890698
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Sonographic discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses in premenopause.
    Radosa MP, Vorwergk J, Fitzgerald J, Kaehler C, Schneider U, Camara O, Runnebaum IB, Schleußner E.
    Ultraschall Med; 2014 Aug 03; 35(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 23775448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Quantifying tumor vascular heterogeneity with DCE-MRI in complex adnexal masses: A preliminary study.
    Thomassin-Naggara I, Soualhi N, Balvay D, Darai E, Cuenod CA.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec 03; 46(6):1776-1785. PubMed ID: 28370815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Accuracy of IOTA Simple Rules, IOTA ADNEX Model, RMI, and Subjective Assessment for Preoperative Adnexal Mass Evaluation: The Experience of a Tertiary Care Referral Hospital.
    Vilendecic Z, Radojevic M, Stefanovic K, Dotlic J, Likic Ladjevic I, Dugalic S, Stefanovic A.
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2023 Dec 03; 88(2):116-122. PubMed ID: 36716716
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.