These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
184 related items for PubMed ID: 29480159
21. Quantitative analysis of myocardial glucose utilization in patients with left ventricular dysfunction by means of 18F-FDG dynamic positron tomography and three-compartment analysis. Morita K, Katoh C, Yoshinaga K, Noriyasu K, Mabuchi M, Tsukamoto T, Kageyama H, Shiga T, Kuge Y, Tamaki N. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2005 Jul; 32(7):806-12. PubMed ID: 15776232 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Kinetic quantitation of cerebral PET-FDG studies without concurrent blood sampling: statistical recovery of the arterial input function. O'Sullivan F, Kirrane J, Muzi M, O'Sullivan JN, Spence AM, Mankoff DA, Krohn KA. IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Mar; 29(3):610-24. PubMed ID: 19709971 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Reproducibility of F18-FDG PET radiomic features for different cervical tumor segmentation methods, gray-level discretization, and reconstruction algorithms. Altazi BA, Zhang GG, Fernandez DC, Montejo ME, Hunt D, Werner J, Biagioli MC, Moros EG. J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 18(6):32-48. PubMed ID: 28891217 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of different kinetic models for dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma with various, also dual-blood input function. Geist BK, Wang J, Wang X, Lin J, Yang X, Zhang H, Li F, Zhao H, Hacker M, Huo L, Li X. Phys Med Biol; 2020 Feb 10; 65(4):045001. PubMed ID: 31896098 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. An input function estimation method for FDG-PET human brain studies. Guo H, Renaut RA, Chen K. Nucl Med Biol; 2007 Jul 10; 34(5):483-92. PubMed ID: 17591548 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Preclinical dynamic 18F-FDG PET - tumor characterization and radiotherapy response assessment by kinetic compartment analysis. Røe K, Aleksandersen TB, Kristian A, Nilsen LB, Seierstad T, Qu H, Ree AH, Olsen DR, Malinen E. Acta Oncol; 2010 Oct 10; 49(7):914-21. PubMed ID: 20831478 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Indirect methods for improving parameter estimation of PET kinetic models. Huang HM, Liu CC, Lin C. Med Phys; 2019 Apr 10; 46(4):1777-1784. PubMed ID: 30762875 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Improved simultaneous estimation of tracer kinetic models with artificial immune network based optimization method. Liu L, Ding H, Huang HB. Appl Radiat Isot; 2016 Jan 10; 107():71-76. PubMed ID: 26433131 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Direct reconstruction of kinetic parameter images from dynamic PET data. Kamasak ME, Bouman CA, Morris ED, Sauer K. IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May 10; 24(5):636-50. PubMed ID: 15889551 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. 18F-FDG-PET partial volume effect correction using a modified recovery coefficient approach based on functional volume and local contrast: physical validation and clinical feasibility in oncology. Anouan KJ, Lelandais B, Edet-Sanson A, Ruan S, Vera P, Gardin I, Hapdey S. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Sep 10; 61(3):301-313. PubMed ID: 26407135 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of 3 methods of automated internal carotid segmentation in human brain PET studies: application to the estimation of arterial input function. Zanotti-Fregonara P, Maroy R, Comtat C, Jan S, Gaura V, Bar-Hen A, Ribeiro MJ, Trébossen R. J Nucl Med; 2009 Mar 10; 50(3):461-7. PubMed ID: 19223421 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Quantitative dynamic cardiac 82Rb PET using generalized factor and compartment analyses. El Fakhri G, Sitek A, Guérin B, Kijewski MF, Di Carli MF, Moore SC. J Nucl Med; 2005 Aug 10; 46(8):1264-71. PubMed ID: 16085581 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparative evaluation of the algorithms for parametric mapping of the novel myocardial PET imaging agent 18F-FPTP. Kim JW, Seo S, Kim HS, Kim DY, Lee HY, Kang KW, Lee DS, Bom HS, Min JJ, Lee JS. Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Jul 10; 31(6):469-479. PubMed ID: 28444503 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Single-input-dual-output modeling of image-based input function estimation. Su Y, Shoghi KI. Mol Imaging Biol; 2010 Jun 10; 12(3):286-94. PubMed ID: 19949986 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Characterization of the image-derived carotid artery input function using independent component analysis for the quantitation of [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography images. Chen K, Chen X, Renaut R, Alexander GE, Bandy D, Guo H, Reiman EM. Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec 07; 52(23):7055-71. PubMed ID: 18029993 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. A method of generating image-derived input function in a quantitative ¹⁸F-FDG PET study based on the shape of the input function curve. Zhou S, Chen K, Reiman EM, Li DM, Shan B. Nucl Med Commun; 2011 Dec 07; 32(12):1121-7. PubMed ID: 21946619 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Hepatic blood perfusion measured by 3-minute dynamic 18F-FDG PET in pigs. Winterdahl M, Munk OL, Sørensen M, Mortensen FV, Keiding S. J Nucl Med; 2011 Jul 07; 52(7):1119-24. PubMed ID: 21680685 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Determination of Fatty Acid Metabolism with Dynamic [11C]Palmitate Positron Emission Tomography of Mouse Heart In Vivo. Li Y, Huang T, Zhang X, Zhong M, Walker NN, He J, Berr SS, Keller SR, Kundu BK. Mol Imaging; 2015 Jul 07; 14():516-25. PubMed ID: 26462138 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Improvement of algorithm for quantification of regional myocardial blood flow using 15O-water with PET. Katoh C, Morita K, Shiga T, Kubo N, Nakada K, Tamaki N. J Nucl Med; 2004 Nov 07; 45(11):1908-16. PubMed ID: 15534062 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Simplified protocol for whole-body Patlak parametric imaging with 18 F-FDG PET/CT: Feasibility and error analysis. Yao S, Feng T, Zhao Y, Wu R, Wang R, Wu S, Li C, Xu B. Med Phys; 2021 May 07; 48(5):2160-2169. PubMed ID: 32304095 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]