These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

204 related items for PubMed ID: 29482611

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Biomechanical Analysis of a Novel Prosthesis Based on the Physiological Curvature of Endplate for Cervical Disc Replacement.
    Yu CC, Hao DJ, Huang DG, Qian LX, Feng H, Li HK, Zhao SC.
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0158234. PubMed ID: 27355319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. In vitro biomechanical comparison after fixed- and mobile-core artificial cervical disc replacement versus fusion.
    Lou J, Li Y, Wang B, Meng Y, Wu T, Liu H.
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Oct; 96(41):e8291. PubMed ID: 29019902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A new cervical artificial disc prosthesis based on physiological curvature of end plate: a finite element analysis.
    Yu CC, Liu P, Huang DG, Jiang YH, Feng H, Hao DJ.
    Spine J; 2016 Nov; 16(11):1384-1391. PubMed ID: 27345748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The Influence of Artificial Cervical Disc Prosthesis Height on the Cervical Biomechanics: A Finite Element Study.
    Yuan W, Zhang H, Zhou X, Wu W, Zhu Y.
    World Neurosurg; 2018 May; 113():e490-e498. PubMed ID: 29462729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty with Prestige-LP Disc: a minimum 6-year follow-up study.
    Zeng J, Liu H, Rong X, Wang B, Yang Y, Gao X, Wu T, Hong Y.
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Aug 07; 19(1):285. PubMed ID: 30086733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. In vivo analysis of cervical kinematics after implantation of a minimally constrained cervical artificial disc replacement.
    Koller H, Meier O, Zenner J, Mayer M, Hitzl W.
    Eur Spine J; 2013 Apr 07; 22(4):747-58. PubMed ID: 23179982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. In vitro-analysis of kinematics and intradiscal pressures in cervical arthroplasty versus fusion--A biomechanical study in a sheep model with two semi-constrained prosthesis.
    Daentzer D, Welke B, Hurschler C, Husmann N, Jansen C, Flamme CH, Richter BI.
    Biomed Eng Online; 2015 Mar 24; 14():27. PubMed ID: 25889378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
    Sasso RC, Best NM.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb 24; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Analysis of in vivo kinematics of 3 different cervical devices: Bryan disc, ProDisc-C, and Prestige LP disc.
    Kowalczyk I, Lazaro BC, Fink M, Rabin D, Duggal N.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Dec 24; 15(6):630-5. PubMed ID: 21905776
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Unique biomechanical signatures of Bryan, Prodisc C, and Prestige LP cervical disc replacements: a finite element modelling study.
    Choi H, Purushothaman Y, Baisden J, Yoganandan N.
    Eur Spine J; 2020 Nov 24; 29(11):2631-2639. PubMed ID: 31606816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Effectiveness of cervical disc replacement for cervical myelopathy].
    Yan D, Xiao Z, Shen C, Huang Y.
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Sep 24; 26(9):1058-61. PubMed ID: 23057346
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.