These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
700 related items for PubMed ID: 29488874
1. Investigation of Extended Bandwidth Hearing Aid Amplification on Speech Intelligibility and Sound Quality in Adults with Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss. Seeto A, Searchfield GD. J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):243-254. PubMed ID: 29488874 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of frequency compression and frequency transposition on fricative and affricate perception in listeners with normal hearing and mild to moderate hearing loss. Alexander JM, Kopun JG, Stelmachowicz PG. Ear Hear; 2014 Mar; 35(5):519-32. PubMed ID: 24699702 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Differences in Word and Phoneme Recognition in Quiet, Sentence Recognition in Noise, and Subjective Outcomes between Manufacturer First-Fit and Hearing Aids Programmed to NAL-NL2 Using Real-Ear Measures. Valente M, Oeding K, Brockmeyer A, Smith S, Kallogjeri D. J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Sep; 29(8):706-721. PubMed ID: 30222541 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses as an Objective Aided Outcome Measure: Effect of Stimulus Level, Bandwidth, and Amplification in Adults With Hearing Loss. Easwar V, Purcell DW, Aiken SJ, Parsa V, Scollie SD. Ear Hear; 2015 Sep; 36(6):635-52. PubMed ID: 26226606 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels. Kuk F, Lau CC, Korhonen P, Crose B. J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 25751695 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss. Johnson EE. J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 23357807 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Sentence recognition in noise and perceived benefit of noise reduction on the receiver and transmitter sides of a BICROS hearing aid. Oeding K, Valente M. J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(10):980-91. PubMed ID: 24384083 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility. Johnson EE, Dillon H. J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Feb; 22(7):441-59. PubMed ID: 21993050 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A Phoneme Perception Test Method for High-Frequency Hearing Aid Fitting. Schmitt N, Winkler A, Boretzki M, Holube I. J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 May; 27(5):367-379. PubMed ID: 27179256 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Predicted and measured speech recognition performance in noise with linear amplification. Magnusson L, Karlsson M, Leijon A. Ear Hear; 2001 Feb; 22(1):46-57. PubMed ID: 11271975 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cortical auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs) in adults in response to filtered speech stimuli. Carter L, Dillon H, Seymour J, Seeto M, Van Dun B. J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):807-22. PubMed ID: 24224988 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]