These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

219 related items for PubMed ID: 29492759

  • 41. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Oates PA, Kurtzberg D, Stapells DR.
    Ear Hear; 2002 Oct; 23(5):399-415. PubMed ID: 12411773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Effect of training rate on recognition of spectrally shifted speech.
    Nogaki G, Fu QJ, Galvin JJ.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 17496666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. Listening to yourself is special: Evidence from global speech rate tracking.
    Maslowski M, Meyer AS, Bosker HR.
    PLoS One; 2018 Apr; 13(9):e0203571. PubMed ID: 30183780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Using speech sounds to test functional spectral resolution in listeners with cochlear implants.
    Winn MB, Litovsky RY.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1430-42. PubMed ID: 25786954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. Central processing of speech sounds and non-speech sounds with similar spectral distribution: An auditory evoked potential study.
    Kaneshiro S, Hiraumi H, Sato H.
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2020 Oct; 47(5):727-733. PubMed ID: 32102744
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. Speech perception adjusts to stable spectrotemporal properties of the listening environment.
    Stilp CE, Anderson PW, Assgari AA, Ellis GM, Zahorik P.
    Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():168-178. PubMed ID: 27596251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Automaticity in speech perception: some speech/nonspeech comparisons.
    Johnson K, Ralston JV.
    Phonetica; 1994 Nov; 51(4):195-209. PubMed ID: 7938203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
    Digeser FM, Wohlberedt T, Hoppe U.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S, Luo X, Krishnan A.
    Ear Hear; 2017 Dec; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels.
    Syrdal AK, Gopal HS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Apr; 79(4):1086-100. PubMed ID: 3700864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Loizou PC, Poroy O.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1619-27. PubMed ID: 11572371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.