These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
265 related items for PubMed ID: 29495696
1. Auditory enhancement under simultaneous masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Kreft HA, Wojtczak M, Oxenham AJ. J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Feb; 143(2):901. PubMed ID: 29495696 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Inherent envelope fluctuations in forward maskers: Effects of masker-probe delay for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. Svec A, Dubno JR, Nelson PB. J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):1195-203. PubMed ID: 27036255 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Behavioral measures of cochlear compression and temporal resolution as predictors of speech masking release in hearing-impaired listeners. Gregan MJ, Nelson PB, Oxenham AJ. J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2895-912. PubMed ID: 24116426 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection threshold for sound distortion resulting from noise reduction in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Brons I, Dreschler WA, Houben R. J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1375. PubMed ID: 25190410 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Auditory-filter characteristics for listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment. Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD, Perez ZD, Delhorne LA. Trends Amplif; 2012 Mar; 16(1):19-39. PubMed ID: 22593204 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of nearby maskers on speech intelligibility in reverberant, multi-talker environments. Westermann A, Buchholz JM. J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2214. PubMed ID: 28372143 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Recovery from on- and off-frequency forward masking in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. Wojtczak M, Oxenham AJ. J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):247-56. PubMed ID: 20649220 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment. D'Aquila LA, Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD. Trends Hear; 2017 Jul; 21():2331216517710354. PubMed ID: 28602128 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing. Koelewijn T, Versfeld NJ, Kramer SE. Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of hearing-aid dynamic range compression on spatial perception in a reverberant environment. Hassager HG, Wiinberg A, Dau T. J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2556. PubMed ID: 28464692 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Temporal masking functions for listeners with real and simulated hearing loss. Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD, Perez ZD, Delhorne LA. J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):915-32. PubMed ID: 21877806 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Better-ear glimpsing in hearing-impaired listeners. Best V, Mason CR, Kidd G, Iyer N, Brungart DS. J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):EL213-9. PubMed ID: 25698053 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Loudness summation of equal loud narrowband signals in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Ewert SD, Oetting D. Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S71-S80. PubMed ID: 28971746 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Spatial release from masking in normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners as a function of the temporal overlap of competing talkers. Best V, Mason CR, Kidd G. J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):1616-25. PubMed ID: 21428524 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]