These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


265 related items for PubMed ID: 29495696

  • 21. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG, Grant KW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Auditory enhancement under forward masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kreft HA, Oxenham AJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Nov; 146(5):3448. PubMed ID: 31795651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
    Imsiecke M, Krüger B, Büchner A, Lenarz T, Nogueira W.
    Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():25-37. PubMed ID: 29673567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. A "Buildup" of Speech Intelligibility in Listeners With Normal Hearing and Hearing Loss.
    Best V, Swaminathan J, Kopčo N, Roverud E, Shinn-Cunningham B.
    Trends Hear; 2018 Jul; 22():2331216518807519. PubMed ID: 30353783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Speech perception in gated noise: the effects of temporal resolution.
    Jin SH, Nelson PB.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 May; 119(5 Pt 1):3097-108. PubMed ID: 16708964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Masker phase effects in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: evidence for peripheral compression at low signal frequencies.
    Oxenham AJ, Dau T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2248-57. PubMed ID: 15532656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Informational masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kidd G, Arbogast TL, Mason CR, Walsh M.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2002 Jun; 3(2):107-19. PubMed ID: 12162362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Effects of interferer facing orientation on speech perception by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Strelcyk O, Pentony S, Kalluri S, Edwards B.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1419-32. PubMed ID: 24606279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Interrupted speech perception: the effects of hearing sensitivity and frequency resolution.
    Jin SH, Nelson PB.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):881-9. PubMed ID: 20707457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. An algorithm to increase intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in the presence of a competing talker.
    Healy EW, Delfarah M, Vasko JL, Carter BL, Wang D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4230. PubMed ID: 28618817
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Growth of low-pass masking of pure tones and speech for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR, Ahlstrom JB.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3113-24. PubMed ID: 8550937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.