These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

313 related items for PubMed ID: 29509052

  • 1. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness with Ultrasound Pachymetry, Noncontact Specular Microscopy and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography.
    Erdur SK, Demirci G, Dikkaya F, Kocabora MS, Ozsutcu M.
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2018; 33(6):782-787. PubMed ID: 29509052
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured by Standard Ultrasound Pachymetry, Corneal Topography, Tono-Pachymetry and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.
    González-Pérez J, Queiruga Piñeiro J, Sánchez García Á, González Méijome JM.
    Curr Eye Res; 2018 Jul; 43(7):866-872. PubMed ID: 29634372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Agreement and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurements by four different optical devices and an ultrasound pachymeter.
    Gokcinar NB, Yumusak E, Ornek N, Yorubulut S, Onaran Z.
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Jul; 39(7):1589-1598. PubMed ID: 29984376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Canine central corneal thickness measurements via Pentacam-HR® , optical coherence tomography (Optovue iVue® ), and high-resolution ultrasound biomicroscopy.
    Wolfel AE, Pederson SL, Cleymaet AM, Hess AM, Freeman KS.
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2018 Jul; 21(4):362-370. PubMed ID: 29034562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by automatic and manual analysis of optical coherence tomography.
    Bruttini C, Esposti R, Pece A, Maione G, Cavallari P.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2024 Jun; 262(6):1857-1863. PubMed ID: 38206413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using optical low-coherence reflectometry, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography, and Scheimpflug camera.
    Gonul S, Koktekir BE, Bakbak B, Gedik S.
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2014 Jun; 77(6):345-50. PubMed ID: 25627178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Measurement of central corneal thickness by high-resolution Scheimpflug imaging, Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and ultrasound pachymetry.
    Chen S, Huang J, Wen D, Chen W, Huang D, Wang Q.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Aug; 90(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 20560892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of central corneal thickness measured with anterior segment optical coherence tomography versus ultrasonic pachymetry.
    Lázaro C, Hernández EM, Martínez D, Redondo P.
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2013 Feb; 88(2):45-9. PubMed ID: 23433191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.