These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1086 related items for PubMed ID: 29530513

  • 1. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis has equal safety to reamed intramedullary nails in treating Gustilo-Anderson type I, II and III-A open tibial shaft fractures.
    Galal S.
    Injury; 2018 Apr; 49(4):866-870. PubMed ID: 29530513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Letter to the editor regarding "Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis has equal safety to reamed intramedullary nails in treating Gustilo-Anderson type I, II and III-A open tibial shaft fractures".
    Imerci A, Aydogan NH.
    Injury; 2018 Aug; 49(8):1634. PubMed ID: 29980302
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of intramedullary nailing and minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis in the treatment of simple intra-articular fractures of the distal tibia (AO-OTA type 43 C1-C2).
    Beytemür O, Barış A, Albay C, Yüksel S, Çağlar S, Alagöz E.
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2017 Jan; 51(1):12-16. PubMed ID: 27825761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison between antegrade intramedullary nailing (IMN), open reduction plate osteosynthesis (ORPO) and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in treatment of humerus diaphyseal fractures.
    Kulkarni VS, Kulkarni MS, Kulkarni GS, Goyal V, Kulkarni MG.
    Injury; 2017 Aug; 48 Suppl 2():S8-S13. PubMed ID: 28802426
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison between intramedullary nailing and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for tibial shaft fractures.
    Kang H, Rho JY, Song JK, Choi J, Kwon YS, Choi S.
    Injury; 2021 Apr; 52(4):1011-1016. PubMed ID: 33563414
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis vs conventional fixation techniques for surgically treated humeral shaft fractures: a meta-analysis.
    Hu X, Xu S, Lu H, Chen B, Zhou X, He X, Dai J, Zhang Z, Gong S.
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 May 11; 11(1):59. PubMed ID: 27169580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A Prospective Randomized Study on Operative Treatment for Simple Distal Tibial Fractures-Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis Versus Minimal Open Reduction and Internal Fixation.
    Kim JW, Kim HU, Oh CW, Kim JW, Park KC.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2018 Jan 11; 32(1):e19-e24. PubMed ID: 28834822
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Bone tissue repair in patients with open diaphyseal tibial fracture treated with biplanar external fixation or reamed locked intramedullary nailing.
    Rodrigues FL, de Abreu LC, Valenti VE, Valente AL, da Costa Pereira Cestari R, Pohl PH, Rodrigues LM.
    Injury; 2014 Nov 11; 45 Suppl 5():S32-5. PubMed ID: 25528622
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Intramedullary nailing versus minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for distal extra-articular tibial fractures: a prospective randomized clinical trial.
    Polat A, Kose O, Canbora K, Yanık S, Guler F.
    J Orthop Sci; 2015 Jul 11; 20(4):695-701. PubMed ID: 25790936
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Interventions for humeral shaft fractures: mixed treatment comparisons of clinical trials.
    Zhao Y, Wang J, Yao W, Cai Q, Wang Y, Yuan W, Gao S.
    Osteoporos Int; 2017 Nov 11; 28(11):3229-3237. PubMed ID: 28780727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. How should open tibia fractures be treated? A retrospective comparative study between intramedullary nailing and biologic plating.
    Kayali C, Ağuş H, Eren A, Ozlük S.
    Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg; 2009 May 11; 15(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 19562546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Combination of intramedullary nail and covered screw osteosynthesis for managing distal tibial fracture with ankle joint involvement].
    Rzesacz EH, Könneker W, Reilmann H, Culemann U.
    Unfallchirurg; 1998 Dec 11; 101(12):907-13. PubMed ID: 10025240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Operative Management of Distal Tibial Extra-articular Fractures - Intramedullary Nail Versus Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis.
    Wani IH, Ul Gani N, Yaseen M, Bashir A, Bhat MS, Farooq M.
    Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2017 Dec 30; 19(6):537-541. PubMed ID: 29493524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Treatment of distal tibial shaft fractures by three different surgical methods: a randomized, prospective study.
    Li Y, Jiang X, Guo Q, Zhu L, Ye T, Chen A.
    Int Orthop; 2014 Jun 30; 38(6):1261-7. PubMed ID: 24549966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Minimally invasive surgical technique: Percutaneous external fixation combined with titanium elastic nails for selective treatment of tibial fractures.
    Tu KK, Zhou XT, Tao ZS, Chen WK, Huang ZL, Sun T, Zhou Q, Yang L.
    Injury; 2015 Dec 30; 46(12):2428-32. PubMed ID: 26472198
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for open fractures of the proximal tibia.
    Kim JW, Oh CW, Jung WJ, Kim JS.
    Clin Orthop Surg; 2012 Dec 30; 4(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 23205242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 55.