These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

626 related items for PubMed ID: 29551386

  • 1. Marginal adaptation of CAD-CAM onlays: Influence of preparation design and impression technique.
    Lima FF, Neto CF, Rubo JH, Santos GC, Moraes Coelho Santos MJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 29551386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of tooth preparation design on marginal adaptation of composite resin CAD-CAM onlays.
    Yang Y, Yang Z, Zhou J, Chen L, Tan J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 31672425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design.
    Euán R, Figueras-Álvarez O, Cabratosa-Termes J, Oliver-Parra R.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 24445027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies.
    Homsy FR, Özcan M, Khoury M, Majzoub ZAK.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 28969918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Marginal and internal adaptation of milled cobalt-chromium copings.
    Kane LM, Chronaios D, Sierraalta M, George FM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Nov; 114(5):680-5. PubMed ID: 26182851
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. An In Vitro Comparison of the Marginal Adaptation Accuracy of CAD/CAM Restorations Using Different Impression Systems.
    Shembesh M, Ali A, Finkelman M, Weber HP, Zandparsa R.
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):581-586. PubMed ID: 26855068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Marginal and internal fit of heat pressed versus CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic onlays after exposure to thermo-mechanical fatigue.
    Guess PC, Vagkopoulou T, Zhang Y, Wolkewitz M, Strub JR.
    J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 24161516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
    Batson ER, Cooper LF, Duqum I, Mendonça G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Influence of the Fabrication Technique on the Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Ceramic Onlays.
    Neto CF, Santos GC, Santos M.
    Oper Dent; 2020 Oct; 45(2):163-172. PubMed ID: 31373887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
    Ahrberg D, Lauer HC, Ahrberg M, Weigl P.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E, Aquilino SA, Gratton DG, Holloway JA, Denry I, Thomas GW, Qian F.
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Can Tooth Preparation Design Affect the Fit of CAD/CAM Restorations?
    Roperto RC, Oliveira MP, Porto TS, Ferreira LA, Melo LS, Akkus A.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2017 Mar; 38(3):e13-e17. PubMed ID: 28257220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Three-Dimensional Digital Evaluation of the Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated from Different CAD/CAM Materials.
    Zimmermann M, Valcanaia A, Neiva G, Mehl A, Fasbinder D.
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e504-e509. PubMed ID: 29508488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression.
    Su TS, Sun J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 27061628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of manufacturing techniques on the marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium implant-supported multiunit frameworks.
    Akçin ET, Güncü MB, Aktaş G, Aslan Y.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):715-720. PubMed ID: 30017153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners.
    Abdel-Azim T, Rogers K, Elathamna E, Zandinejad A, Metz M, Morton D.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 26100929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Influence of Different CAM Strategies on the Fit of Partial Crown Restorations: A Digital Three-dimensional Evaluation.
    Zimmermann M, Valcanaia A, Neiva G, Mehl A, Fasbinder D.
    Oper Dent; 2018 Oct; 43(5):530-538. PubMed ID: 29630483
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 32.