These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
416 related items for PubMed ID: 29556942
1. Feasibility of myocardial flow reserve prediction without the use of dynamic data from myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography. Hashimoto H, Fukushima Y, Kumita SI, Tomiyama T, Kiriyama T. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Aug; 34(8):1323-1329. PubMed ID: 29556942 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic value of PET-measured longitudinal flow gradient for the identification of coronary artery disease. Valenta I, Quercioli A, Schindler TH. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Apr; 7(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 24631507 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Patients with reduced heart rate response to adenosine infusion have low myocardial flow reserve in (13)N-ammonia PET studies. Tomiyama T, Kumita S, Ishihara K, Suda M, Sakurai M, Hakozaki K, Hashimoto H, Takahashi N, Takano H, Kobayashi Y, Kiriyama T, Fukushima Y, Shimizu W. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jun; 31(5):1089-95. PubMed ID: 25846547 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic value of 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion PET: added value of myocardial flow reserve. Fiechter M, Ghadri JR, Gebhard C, Fuchs TA, Pazhenkottil AP, Nkoulou RN, Herzog BA, Wyss CA, Gaemperli O, Kaufmann PA. J Nucl Med; 2012 Aug; 53(8):1230-4. PubMed ID: 22776752 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Simplified quantification of 13N-ammonia PET myocardial blood flow: A comparative study with the standard compartment model to facilitate clinical use. Chang CY, Hung GU, Hsu B, Yang BH, Chang CW, Hu LH, Huang WS, Wang HE, Wu TC, Liu RS. J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Jun; 27(3):819-828. PubMed ID: 30324328 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Integrated Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Diagnostics Improve Detection of Functionally Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis by 13N-ammonia Positron Emission Tomography. Lee JM, Kim CH, Koo BK, Hwang D, Park J, Zhang J, Tong Y, Jeon KH, Bang JI, Suh M, Paeng JC, Cheon GJ, Na SH, Ahn JM, Park SJ, Kim HS. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Sep; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 27609817 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantification of myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve by 13N-NH3 PET/CT is not significantly affected by pixel size. Tanada T, Ohba M, Kanezawa C, Suzuki K. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 Jan; 39(1):195-199. PubMed ID: 36598684 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of clinical tools for measurements of regional stress and rest myocardial blood flow assessed with 13N-ammonia PET/CT. Slomka PJ, Alexanderson E, Jácome R, Jiménez M, Romero E, Meave A, Le Meunier L, Dalhbom M, Berman DS, Germano G, Schelbert H. J Nucl Med; 2012 Feb; 53(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 22228795 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between N13NH3-PET and 99mTc-Tetrofosmin-CZT SPECT in the evaluation of absolute myocardial blood flow and flow reserve. Giubbini R, Bertoli M, Durmo R, Bonacina M, Peli A, Faggiano I, Albano D, Milan E, Stern E, Paghera B, Rodella C, Cerudelli E, Gazzilli M, Dondi F, Bertagna F, Camoni L. J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Oct; 28(5):1906-1918. PubMed ID: 31728817 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Internal validation of myocardial flow reserve PET imaging using stress/rest myocardial activity ratios with Rb-82 and N-13-ammonia. Juneau D, Wu KY, Kaps N, Yao J, Renaud JM, Beanlands RSB, Ruddy TD, deKemp RA. J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Jun; 28(3):835-850. PubMed ID: 33389638 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. SPECT myocardial blood flow quantitation toward clinical use: a comparative study with 13N-Ammonia PET myocardial blood flow quantitation. Hsu B, Hu LH, Yang BH, Chen LC, Chen YK, Ting CH, Hung GU, Huang WS, Wu TC. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Jan; 44(1):117-128. PubMed ID: 27585576 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. First validation of myocardial flow reserve assessed by dynamic 99mTc-sestamibi CZT-SPECT camera: head to head comparison with 15O-water PET and fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. The WATERDAY study. Agostini D, Roule V, Nganoa C, Roth N, Baavour R, Parienti JJ, Beygui F, Manrique A. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Jul; 45(7):1079-1090. PubMed ID: 29497801 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging and [15O]H2O positron emission tomography. Everaars H, van Diemen PA, Bom MJ, Schumacher SP, de Winter RW, van de Ven PM, Raijmakers PG, Lammertsma AA, Hofman MBM, van der Geest RJ, Götte MJ, van Rossum AC, Nijveldt R, Danad I, Driessen RS, Knaapen P. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Jul; 47(7):1688-1697. PubMed ID: 31822958 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of time-of-flight on qualitative and quantitative analyses of myocardial perfusion PET studies using (13)N-ammonia. Tomiyama T, Ishihara K, Suda M, Kanaya K, Sakurai M, Takahashi N, Takano H, Nitta K, Hakozaki K, Kumita S. J Nucl Cardiol; 2015 Oct; 22(5):998-1007. PubMed ID: 25467250 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Feasibility and operator variability of myocardial blood flow and reserve measurements with ⁹⁹mTc-sestamibi quantitative dynamic SPECT/CT imaging. Klein R, Hung GU, Wu TC, Huang WS, Li D, deKemp RA, Hsu B. J Nucl Cardiol; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1075-88. PubMed ID: 25280761 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic value of myocardial flow reserve vs corrected myocardial flow reserve in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease. Huck DM, Weber BN, Brown JM, Lopez D, Hainer J, Blankstein R, Dorbala S, Divakaran S, Di Carli MF. J Nucl Cardiol; 2024 Jul; 37():101854. PubMed ID: 38606610 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Coronary artery lumen volume index as a marker of flow-limiting atherosclerosis-validation against 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography. Benetos G, Benz DC, Rampidis GP, Giannopoulos AA, von Felten E, Bakula A, Sustar A, Fuchs TA, Pazhenkottil AP, Gebhard C, Kaufmann PA, Gräni C, Buechel RR. Eur Radiol; 2021 Jul; 31(7):5116-5126. PubMed ID: 33454800 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimization of SPECT Measurement of Myocardial Blood Flow with Corrections for Attenuation, Motion, and Blood Binding Compared with PET. Wells RG, Marvin B, Poirier M, Renaud J, deKemp RA, Ruddy TD. J Nucl Med; 2017 Dec; 58(12):2013-2019. PubMed ID: 28611245 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of two software systems for quantification of myocardial blood flow in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Yalcin H, Valenta I, Zhao M, Tahari A, Lu DY, Higuchi T, Yalcin F, Kucukler N, Soleimanifard Y, Zhou Y, Pomper MG, Abraham TP, Tsui B, Lodge MA, Schindler TH, Roselle Abraham M. J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1243-1253. PubMed ID: 29359273 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy and Reproducibility of Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification by Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Imaging in Patients With Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease. de Souza ACDAH, Harms HJ, Martell L, Bibbo C, Harrington M, Sullivan K, Hainer J, Dorbala S, Blankstein R, Taqueti VR, Foley Kijewski M, Park MA, Meretta A, Breault C, Roth N, Poitrasson-Rivière A, Soman P, Gullberg GT, Di Carli MF. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Jun; 15(6):e013987. PubMed ID: 35674051 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]