These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

629 related items for PubMed ID: 29557828

  • 1. The Influence of Corneal Biomechanical Properties on Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using a Rebound Self-tonometer.
    Brown L, Foulsham W, Pronin S, Tatham AJ.
    J Glaucoma; 2018 Jun; 27(6):511-518. PubMed ID: 29557828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
    Kaushik S, Pandav SS, Banger A, Aggarwal K, Gupta A.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of a New Rebound Self-tonometer, Icare HOME: Comparison With Goldmann Applanation Tonometer.
    Takagi D, Sawada A, Yamamoto T.
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Jul; 26(7):613-618. PubMed ID: 28369004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Relationship of central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure by iCare rebound tonometer.
    Rao A, Kumar M, Prakash B, Varshney G.
    J Glaucoma; 2014 Aug; 23(6):380-4. PubMed ID: 23221904
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.
    Vandewalle E, Vandenbroeck S, Stalmans I, Zeyen T.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009 Aug; 19(5):783-9. PubMed ID: 19787598
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare® Home rebound tonometer (model TA022) and comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients].
    Valero B, Fénolland JR, Rosenberg R, Sendon D, Mesnard C, Sigaux M, Giraud JM, Renard JP.
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec; 40(10):865-875. PubMed ID: 29174296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements and assessment of intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility with the portable ICare rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.
    Salim S, Du H, Wan J.
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec; 22(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 23542696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer.
    Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR, Zhu H, Garway-Heath DF.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5337-47. PubMed ID: 17122122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of the Intraocular Pressure Measured Using the New Rebound Tonometer Icare ic100 and Icare TA01i or Goldmann Applanation Tonometer.
    Nakakura S, Mori E, Fujio Y, Fujisawa Y, Matsuya K, Kobayashi Y, Tabuchi H, Asaoka R, Kiuchi Y.
    J Glaucoma; 2019 Feb; 28(2):172-177. PubMed ID: 30689609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. ICare Pro: Age Dependent Effect of Central Corneal Thickness on Intraocular Pressure in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Patients.
    Hohberger B, Sommerfeld C, Lucio M, Bergua A.
    Curr Eye Res; 2020 Jun; 45(6):668-674. PubMed ID: 31905299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.
    Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Parisi L.
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Jun; 15(3):213-7. PubMed ID: 16778643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The effect of corneal biomechanical properties on rebound tonometer in patients with normal-tension glaucoma.
    Shin J, Lee JW, Kim EA, Caprioli J.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 159(1):144-54. PubMed ID: 25308786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group.
    Chen M, Zhang L, Xu J, Chen X, Gu Y, Ren Y, Wang K.
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov 14; 19(1):225. PubMed ID: 31726999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties with the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer.
    Detry-Morel M, Jamart J, Pourjavan S.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011 Nov 14; 21(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 20853262
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of the Icare ic100 Rebound Tonometer and the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in 1,000 Eyes.
    Subramaniam AG, Allen P, Toh T.
    Ophthalmic Res; 2021 Nov 14; 64(2):321-326. PubMed ID: 32906125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Can Corneal Biomechanical Properties Explain Difference in Tonometric Measurement in Normal Eyes?
    Dey A, David RL, Asokan R, George R.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Feb 14; 95(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 29370019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The relationship between diurnal variations in intraocular pressure measurements and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
    Kotecha A, Crabb DP, Spratt A, Garway-Heath DF.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Sep 14; 50(9):4229-36. PubMed ID: 19407025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Modified Goldmann prism intraocular pressure measurement accuracy and correlation to corneal biomechanical metrics: multicentre randomised clinical trial.
    McCafferty SJ, Tetrault K, McColgin A, Chue W, Levine J, Muller M.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec 14; 103(12):1840-1844. PubMed ID: 30796054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Corneal viscoelastic differences between pseudoexfoliative glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma.
    Ozkok A, Tamcelik N, Ozdamar A, Sarici AM, Cicik E.
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec 14; 22(9):740-5. PubMed ID: 24299728
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty.
    Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Miani F, Tosoni C, Parisi L, Brusini P.
    Eye (Lond); 2011 May 14; 25(5):642-50. PubMed ID: 21436848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 32.