These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Visibility of normal thoracic anatomic landmarks on storage phosphor digital radiography versus conventional radiography. Konen E, Greenberg I, Rozenman J. Isr Med Assoc J; 2005 Aug; 7(8):495-7. PubMed ID: 16106773 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Imaging properties of digital image-intensifier radiography compared to the conventional x-ray technic for chest pictures]. Dölken W, Krahe T, Landwehr P, Lackner K. Rofo; 1989 Jan; 150(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 2536505 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Digital radiography of the thorax with selenium detector. Clinical results and optimization potential of the technique]. Procacci C, Minniti S, Caumo F, Moore F, Ternullo S, Predicatori F, Locatelli F, Pistolesi GF. Radiol Med; 1998 Nov; 96(5):446-53. PubMed ID: 10051867 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques]. Lehmann KJ, Busch HP, Drescher P, Loose R, Georgi M. Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology. Fernandez JM, Ordiales JM, Guibelalde E, Prieto C, Vano E. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008 Jan; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics]. Busch HP, Lehmann KJ, Georgi M. Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose. Seibert JA. Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 18849693 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems. Sun Z, Lin C, Tyan Y, Ng KH. Clin Imaging; 2012 Nov; 36(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22726965 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Radiologic study of the thorax using the digital method (FCR 101). Evaluation of various parameters as related to exposure]. Perri G, Battolla L, Palla L, D'Alessandro F, Torri T, Tagliagambe A. Radiol Med; 1991 Nov; 82(1-2):84-8. PubMed ID: 1896586 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Studies on trigonometric transform enhancement of chest radiograph based on its anatomical feature]. Cao X, Jiang D, Zheng C. Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 1998 Mar; 22(2):92-4, 97. PubMed ID: 12016837 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization]. Redlich U, Hoeschen C, Effenberger O, Fessel A, Preuss H, Reissberg S, Scherlach C, Döhring W. Rofo; 2005 Feb; 177(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 15666237 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Contrast mapping and evaluation for electronic X-ray images on CRT display monitor. Suzuki J, Furukawa I, Ono S, Kitamura M, Ando Y. IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Dec; 16(6):772-84. PubMed ID: 9533578 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Initial clinical results with a new needle screen storage phosphor system in chest radiograms. Körner M, Wirth S, Treitl M, Reiser M, Pfeifer KJ. Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1491-6. PubMed ID: 16302129 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]