These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
144 related items for PubMed ID: 2958630
1. Comparison of detection procedures for Chlamydia trachomatis, including enzyme immunoassays, in a mouse model of genital infection. Taylor-Robinson D, Tuffrey M. J Med Microbiol; 1987 Sep; 24(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 2958630 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the Syva Microtrak enzyme immunoassay and Abbott Chlamydiazyme in the detection of chlamydial infections in women. Olsen MA, Sambol AR, Bohnert VA. Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Feb; 119(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 7848062 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of chlamydiazyme for the detection of genital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis. Howard LV, Coleman PF, England BJ, Herrmann JE. J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Feb; 23(2):329-32. PubMed ID: 3517052 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Pharmacia Chlamydia EIA, IDEIA and cell culture in the detection of urogenital chlamydial infection. Bygdeman SM, Lidbrink P, Nahkiaisoja M, Parkhede U. Int J STD AIDS; 1990 May; 1(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 2083294 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of an enzyme immunoassay (Ortho) with cell culture and immunofluorescence for the detection of genital chlamydial infection. Mumtaz G, Ridgway GL, Nayagam AT, Robinson AJ. Int J STD AIDS; 1990 May; 1(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 2083292 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Limited value of two widely used enzyme immunoassays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women. Thomas BJ, MacLeod EJ, Hay PE, Horner PJ, Taylor-Robinson D. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1994 Aug; 13(8):651-5. PubMed ID: 7813495 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of three immunoassays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from asymptomatic males. Leonardi GP, Seitz M, Edstrom R, Cruz J, Costello P, Szabo K. J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Nov; 30(11):2793-6. PubMed ID: 1452648 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative evaluation of detection assays for Chlamydia trachomatis. Warren R, Dwyer B, Plackett M, Pettit K, Rizvi N, Baker AM. J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Jun; 31(6):1663-6. PubMed ID: 8315015 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of two enzyme immunoassays and an immunofluorescence test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. Grillner L, Beckman S, Hammar H. Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Oct; 5(5):559-62. PubMed ID: 3536502 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of cell culture with two direct Chlamydia tests using immunofluorescence or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Pothier P, Kazmierczak A. Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Oct; 5(5):569-72. PubMed ID: 3536504 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections by cell culture and two enzyme immunoassays detecting different chlamydial antigens. Mahony J, Castriciano S, Sellors J, Stewart I, Cunningham I, Landis S, Seidelman W, Grant L, Devlin C, Chernesky M. J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Sep; 27(9):1934-8. PubMed ID: 2674191 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The superiority of polymerase chain reaction over an amplified enzyme immunoassay for the detection of genital chlamydial infections. Jalal H, Stephen H, Al-Suwaine A, Sonnex C, Carne C. Sex Transm Infect; 2006 Feb; 82(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 16461600 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of direct immunofluorescent staining and an enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay for identifying Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical and urethral specimens. Wiesmeier E, Bruckner DA, Malotte CK, Downie A. J Reprod Med; 1989 Aug; 34(8):517-9. PubMed ID: 2681749 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]