These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

650 related items for PubMed ID: 29594772

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Virtual Screening of Novel Glucosamine-6-Phosphate Synthase Inhibitors.
    Lather A, Sharma S, Khatkar A.
    Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2018; 21(3):182-193. PubMed ID: 29600755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Virtual screening in lead discovery and optimization.
    Jain AN.
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2004 Jul; 7(4):396-403. PubMed ID: 15338948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Protein-Ligand Empirical Interaction Components for Virtual Screening.
    Yan Y, Wang W, Sun Z, Zhang JZH, Ji C.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Aug 28; 57(8):1793-1806. PubMed ID: 28678484
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases.
    Cavasotto CN, Abagyan RA.
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Mar 12; 337(1):209-25. PubMed ID: 15001363
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Receptor-based virtual screening protocol for drug discovery.
    Cerqueira NM, Gesto D, Oliveira EF, Santos-Martins D, Brás NF, Sousa SF, Fernandes PA, Ramos MJ.
    Arch Biochem Biophys; 2015 Sep 15; 582():56-67. PubMed ID: 26045247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Structure-Based Virtual Screening.
    Li Q, Shah S.
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017 Sep 15; 1558():111-124. PubMed ID: 28150235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. SDOVS: a solvent dipole ordering-based method for virtual screening.
    Murata K, Nagata N, Nakanishi I, Kitaura K.
    J Comput Chem; 2010 Nov 30; 31(15):2714-22. PubMed ID: 20839298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening.
    Stroganov OV, Novikov FN, Stroylov VS, Kulkov V, Chilov GG.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec 30; 48(12):2371-85. PubMed ID: 19007114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Empirical Scoring Functions for Affinity Prediction of Protein-ligand Complexes.
    Pason LP, Sotriffer CA.
    Mol Inform; 2016 Dec 30; 35(11-12):541-548. PubMed ID: 27870243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.
    Wang Z, Sun H, Yao X, Li D, Xu L, Li Y, Tian S, Hou T.
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May 14; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Discovery of binding proteins for a protein target using protein-protein docking-based virtual screening.
    Zhang C, Tang B, Wang Q, Lai L.
    Proteins; 2014 Oct 14; 82(10):2472-82. PubMed ID: 24854898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Docking, virtual high throughput screening and in silico fragment-based drug design.
    Zoete V, Grosdidier A, Michielin O.
    J Cell Mol Med; 2009 Feb 14; 13(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 19183238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 33.