These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

506 related items for PubMed ID: 29606657

  • 21. An evaluation of two dental simulation systems: virtual reality versus contemporary non-computer-assisted.
    Jasinevicius TR, Landers M, Nelson S, Urbankova A.
    J Dent Educ; 2004 Nov; 68(11):1151-62. PubMed ID: 15520234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Development and Assessment of Discrimination Exercises for Faculty Calibration in Preclinical Operative Dentistry.
    Ahmed SN, Sturdevant J, Wilder R, Kowlowitz V, Boushell L.
    J Dent Educ; 2016 Aug; 80(8):994-1003. PubMed ID: 27480711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Assessment of practical tasks in the Phantom course of Conservative Dentistry by pre-defined criteria: a comparison between self-assessment by students and assessment by instructors.
    Huth KC, Baumann M, Kollmuss M, Hickel R, Fischer MR, Paschos E.
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2017 Feb; 21(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 26642844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Effect of Employing Different Typodonts When Using E4D Compare for Dental Student Assessment.
    Callan RS, Cooper JR, Young NB, Mollica AG, Furness AR, Looney SW.
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Jun; 79(6):705-10. PubMed ID: 26034036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Impact of Digital Tooth Preparation Evaluation Technology on Preclinical Dental Students' Technical and Self-Evaluation Skills.
    Gratton DG, Kwon SR, Blanchette D, Aquilino SA.
    J Dent Educ; 2016 Jan; 80(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 26729689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. The Validity of Using E4D Compare's "% Comparison" to Assess Crown Preparations in Preclinical Dental Education.
    Callan RS, Haywood VB, Cooper JR, Furness AR, Looney SW.
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Dec; 79(12):1445-51. PubMed ID: 26632299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Using tablet technology and instructional videos to enhance preclinical dental laboratory learning.
    Gadbury-Amyot CC, Purk JH, Williams BJ, Van Ness CJ.
    J Dent Educ; 2014 Feb; 78(2):250-8. PubMed ID: 24489032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. The effects of student self-assessment on learning in removable prosthodontics laboratory.
    Chambers DW, LaBarre EE.
    J Dent Educ; 2014 May; 78(5):668-80. PubMed ID: 24789827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Effect of Computer-Assisted Learning on Students' Dental Anatomy Waxing Performance.
    Kwon SR, Hernández M, Blanchette DR, Lam MT, Gratton DG, Aquilino SA.
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1093-100. PubMed ID: 26329034
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. An initial assessment of haptics in preclinical operative dentistry training.
    Koo S, Kim A, Donoff RB, Karimbux NY.
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2015 Feb; 6(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 23946269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Influence of Self-Assessment on Dental Students' Performance on Technical Assessments in Periodontics.
    Deeb JG, Carrico CK, Laskin DM, Koertge TE.
    J Dent Educ; 2019 Apr; 83(4):457-463. PubMed ID: 30745351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Self-Paced Versus Instructor-Paced Preclinical Training in Operative Dentistry: A Case Study.
    Hildebrandt GH, Belmont MA.
    J Dent Educ; 2018 Nov; 82(11):1178-1184. PubMed ID: 30385684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Effectiveness of and Dental Student Satisfaction with Three Teaching Methods for Behavior Guidance Techniques in Pediatric Dentistry.
    Slaven CM, Wells MH, DeSchepper EJ, Dormois L, Vinall CV, Douglas K.
    J Dent Educ; 2019 Aug; 83(8):966-972. PubMed ID: 31085686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. A Systematic Review of the Use of Self-Assessment in Preclinical and Clinical Dental Education.
    Mays KA, Branch-Mays GL.
    J Dent Educ; 2016 Aug; 80(8):902-13. PubMed ID: 27480701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Comparison between students' self-assessment, and visual and digital assessment techniques in dental anatomy wax-up grading.
    Abdalla R, Bishop SS, Villasante-Tezanos AG, Bertoli E.
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2021 Aug; 25(3):524-535. PubMed ID: 33188546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Development and Implementation of an Electronic Clinical Formative Assessment: Dental Faculty and Student Perspectives.
    Kirkup ML, Adams BN, Meadows ML, Jackson R.
    J Dent Educ; 2016 Jun; 80(6):652-61. PubMed ID: 27251346
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Comparing dental student preclinical self-assessment in the United States and Japan.
    Tabassian LJ, Nagasawa M, Ba AK, Akiba N, Akiba Y, Uoshima K, Ohyama H.
    J Dent Educ; 2022 Jan; 86(1):21-28. PubMed ID: 34437721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Improving the quality of preclinical simulation training for dental students using a new digital real-time evaluation system.
    Tang L, Cao Y, Liu Z, Qian K, Liu Y, Liu Y, Zhou Y.
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2021 Feb; 25(1):100-107. PubMed ID: 32777156
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Dental Students' Skills Assessments: Comparisons of Daily Clinical Grades and Clinical and Laboratory Assessments.
    Bertoli E, Lawson KP, Bishop SS.
    J Dent Educ; 2018 Apr; 82(4):417-423. PubMed ID: 29606660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Evaluating Student Self-Assessment through Video-Recorded Patient Simulations.
    Sanderson TR, Kearney RC, Kissell D, Salisbury J.
    J Dent Hyg; 2016 Aug; 90(4):257-62. PubMed ID: 27551147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.