These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

964 related items for PubMed ID: 29614276

  • 1. Induction of labor using one dose vs multiple doses of misoprostol: a randomized controlled trial.
    Pimentel VM, Arabkhazaeli M, Moon JY, Wang A, Kapedani A, Bernstein PS, Tropper PJ.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):614.e1-614.e8. PubMed ID: 29614276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Buccal vs vaginal misoprostol combined with Foley catheter for cervical ripening at term (the BEGIN trial): a randomized controlled trial.
    Gomez HB, Hoffman MK, Caplan R, Ruhstaller K, Young MHH, Sciscione AC.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 224(5):524.e1-524.e8. PubMed ID: 33617796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Induction of labor with misoprostol for premature rupture of membranes beyond thirty-six weeks' gestation.
    Wing DA, Paul RH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jul; 179(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 9704771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The efficacy of misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral misoprostol in the induction of labor of nulliparous women: A randomized national multicenter trial.
    Hokkila E, Kruit H, Rahkonen L, Timonen S, Mattila M, Laatio L, Ordén MR, Uotila J, Luukkaala T, Tihtonen K.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Aug; 98(8):1032-1039. PubMed ID: 30771243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Transcervical Foley Balloon Plus Vaginal Misoprostol versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening in Nulliparous Obese Women: A Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative-Effectiveness Trial.
    Viteri OA, Tabsh KK, Alrais MA, Salazar XC, Lopez JM, Fok RY, Chauhan SP, Sibai BM.
    Am J Perinatol; 2021 Aug; 38(S 01):e123-e128. PubMed ID: 32299108
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Hill JB, Thigpen BD, Bofill JA, Magann E, Moore LE, Martin JN.
    Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A comparison of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for cervical ripening in women for labor induction at term (the IMPROVE trial): a triple-masked randomized controlled trial.
    Haas DM, Daggy J, Flannery KM, Dorr ML, Bonsack C, Bhamidipalli SS, Pierson RC, Lathrop A, Towns R, Ngo N, Head A, Morgan S, Quinney SK.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 221(3):259.e1-259.e16. PubMed ID: 31075246
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus oxytocin for labor induction.
    Moraes Filho OB, Albuquerque RM, Cecatti JG.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Aug; 89(8):1045-52. PubMed ID: 20636243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis.
    Orr L, Reisinger-Kindle K, Roy A, Levine L, Connolly K, Visintainer P, Schoen CN.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Nov; 223(5):743.e1-743.e17. PubMed ID: 32387325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Cervical ripening balloon with and without oxytocin in multiparas: a randomized controlled trial.
    Bauer AM, Lappen JR, Gecsi KS, Hackney DN.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Sep; 219(3):294.e1-294.e6. PubMed ID: 29763609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Induction of labor at term with vaginal misoprostol or a prostaglandin E2 pessary: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial.
    Gaudineau A, Senat MV, Ehlinger V, Gallini A, Morin M, Olivier P, Roth E, Orusco E, Javoise S, Fort J, Lavergne C, Arnaud C, Rozenberg P, Vayssiere C, Groupe de Recherche en Obstétrique rt Gynécologie.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):542.e1-542.e8. PubMed ID: 33887241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Dällenbach P, Boulvain M, Viardot C, Irion O.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jan; 188(1):162-7. PubMed ID: 12548212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA, Ham D, Paul RH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 180(5):1155-60. PubMed ID: 10329871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A comparison of various routes and dosages of misoprostol for cervical ripening and the induction of labor.
    How HY, Leaseburge L, Khoury JC, Siddiqi TA, Spinnato JA, Sibai BM.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):911-5. PubMed ID: 11641677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter pre-induction of labor].
    Jagielska I, Kazdepka-Ziemińska A, Janicki R, Fórmaniak J, Walentowicz-Sadłecka M, Grabiec M.
    Ginekol Pol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 23700844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Chang CH, Chang FM.
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Misoprostol With Foley Bulb Compared With Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Al-Ibraheemi Z, Brustman L, Bimson BE, Porat N, Rosenn B.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 131(1):23-29. PubMed ID: 29215514
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Predicting factors on cervical ripening and response to induction in women pregnant over 37 weeks.
    Bahadori F, Ayatollahi H, Naghavi-Behzad M, Khalkhali H, Naseri Z.
    Med Ultrason; 2013 Sep; 15(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 23979614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.
    Paungmora N, Herabutya Y, O-Prasertsawat P, Punyavachira P.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: misoprostol vs oxytocin.
    Fonseca L, Wood HC, Lucas MJ, Ramin SM, Phatak D, Gilstrap LC, Yeomans ER.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 199(3):305.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18771993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 49.