These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

397 related items for PubMed ID: 29627326

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Skin antisepsis for reducing central venous catheter-related infections.
    Lai NM, Lai NA, O'Riordan E, Chaiyakunapruk N, Taylor JE, Tan K.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Jul 13; 7(7):CD010140. PubMed ID: 27410189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Prospective, randomized trial of two antiseptic solutions for prevention of central venous or arterial catheter colonization and infection in intensive care unit patients.
    Mimoz O, Pieroni L, Lawrence C, Edouard A, Costa Y, Samii K, Brun-Buisson C.
    Crit Care Med; 1996 Nov 13; 24(11):1818-23. PubMed ID: 8917031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A randomized trial comparing povidone-iodine to a chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated dressing for prevention of central venous catheter infections in neonates.
    Garland JS, Alex CP, Mueller CD, Otten D, Shivpuri C, Harris MC, Naples M, Pellegrini J, Buck RK, McAuliffe TL, Goldmann DA, Maki DG.
    Pediatrics; 2001 Jun 13; 107(6):1431-6. PubMed ID: 11389271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of 0.05% chlorhexidine and 10% povidone-iodine as cutaneous disinfectant for prevention of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection: a comparative study.
    Ishizuka M, Nagata H, Takagi K, Kubota K.
    Eur Surg Res; 2009 Jun 13; 43(3):286-90. PubMed ID: 19648751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of four skin preparation strategies to prevent catheter-related infection in intensive care unit (CLEAN trial): a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Goudet V, Timsit JF, Lucet JC, Lepape A, Balayn D, Seguin S, Mimoz O.
    Trials; 2013 Apr 27; 14():114. PubMed ID: 23782845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Chlorhexidine-based antiseptic solution vs alcohol-based povidone-iodine for central venous catheter care.
    Mimoz O, Villeminey S, Ragot S, Dahyot-Fizelier C, Laksiri L, Petitpas F, Debaene B.
    Arch Intern Med; 2007 Oct 22; 167(19):2066-72. PubMed ID: 17954800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Efficacy of 1.0% chlorhexidine-gluconate ethanol compared with 10% povidone-iodine for long-term central venous catheter care in hematology departments: a prospective study.
    Yamamoto N, Kimura H, Misao H, Matsumoto H, Imafuku Y, Watanabe A, Mori H, Yoshida A, Miura S, Abe Y, Toba M, Suzuki H, Ogawa K, Kanemitsu K.
    Am J Infect Control; 2014 May 22; 42(5):574-6. PubMed ID: 24655901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Chlorhexidine disinfectant can reduce the risk of central venous catheter infection compared with povidone: a meta-analysis.
    Shi Y, Yang N, Zhang L, Zhang M, Pei HH, Wang H.
    Am J Infect Control; 2019 Oct 22; 47(10):1255-1262. PubMed ID: 30948152
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.