These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Adjacent segment biomechanical changes after one- or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using either a zero-profile device or cage plus plate: A finite element analysis. Hua W, Zhi J, Ke W, Wang B, Yang S, Li L, Yang C. Comput Biol Med; 2020 May; 120():103760. PubMed ID: 32421657 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical evaluation of adjacent segment degeneration after one- or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty: A finite element analysis. Hua W, Zhi J, Wang B, Ke W, Sun W, Yang S, Li L, Yang C. Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Jun; 189():105352. PubMed ID: 31991316 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel S-Type, Dynamic Zero-Profile Cage Design for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Variations in Bone Graft Shape: A Finite Element Analysis. Manickam PS, Roy S, Shetty GM. World Neurosurg; 2021 Oct; 154():e199-e214. PubMed ID: 34246827 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro investigation of a new dynamic cervical implant: comparison to spinal fusion and total disc replacement. Welke B, Schwarze M, Hurschler C, Book T, Magdu S, Daentzer D. Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2247-54. PubMed ID: 26684468 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional motion analysis of the cervical spine for comparison of anterior cervical decompression and fusion versus artificial disc replacement in 17 patients: clinical article. McDonald CP, Chang V, McDonald M, Ramo N, Bey MJ, Bartol S. J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Mar; 20(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 24359000 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical Analysis of Two-level Cervical Disc Replacement With a Stand-alone U-shaped Disc Implant. Li Y, Fogel GR, Liao Z, Tyagi R, Zhang G, Liu W. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Oct 15; 42(20):E1173-E1181. PubMed ID: 28198781 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis. Hwang SH, Kayanja M, Milks RA, Benzel EC. Spine J; 2007 Oct 15; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanics of an integrated interbody device versus ACDF anterior locking plate in a single-level cervical spine fusion construct. Stein MI, Nayak AN, Gaskins RB, Cabezas AF, Santoni BG, Castellvi AE. Spine J; 2014 Jan 15; 14(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 24231054 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Does location of rotation center in artificial disc affect cervical biomechanics? Mo Z, Zhao Y, Du C, Sun Y, Zhang M, Fan Y. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Apr 15; 40(8):E469-75. PubMed ID: 25868102 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]