These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
278 related items for PubMed ID: 29633000
1. Inter-operator variability and source of errors in tumour response assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib. Tovoli F, Renzulli M, Negrini G, Brocchi S, Ferrarini A, Andreone A, Benevento F, Golfieri R, Morselli-Labate AM, Mastroroberto M, Badea RI, Piscaglia F. Eur Radiol; 2018 Sep; 28(9):3611-3620. PubMed ID: 29633000 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. CT imaging findings in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib: Alternative response criteria (Choi, European Association for the Study of the Liver, and modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (mRECIST)) versus RECIST 1.1. Gavanier M, Ayav A, Sellal C, Orry X, Claudon M, Bronowicki JP, Laurent V. Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):103-112. PubMed ID: 26724654 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. mRECIST to predict survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Analysis of two randomised phase II trials comparing nintedanib vs sorafenib. Meyer T, Palmer DH, Cheng AL, Hocke J, Loembé AB, Yen CJ. Liver Int; 2017 Jul; 37(7):1047-1055. PubMed ID: 28066978 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Alternative Response Criteria (Choi, European association for the study of the liver, and modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST]) Versus RECIST 1.1 in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib. Ronot M, Bouattour M, Wassermann J, Bruno O, Dreyer C, Larroque B, Castera L, Vilgrain V, Belghiti J, Raymond E, Faivre S. Oncologist; 2014 Apr; 19(4):394-402. PubMed ID: 24652387 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors is superior to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors for assessment of responses to sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Takada J, Hidaka H, Nakazawa T, Kondo M, Numata K, Tanaka K, Matsunaga K, Okuse C, Kobayashi S, Morimoto M, Ohkawa S, Koizumi W. BMC Res Notes; 2015 Oct 26; 8():609. PubMed ID: 26502722 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Hepatocellular carcinoma enhancement on contrast-enhanced CT and MR imaging: response assessment after treatment with sorafenib: preliminary results. Salvaggio G, Furlan A, Agnello F, Cabibbo G, Marin D, Giannitrapani L, Genco C, Midiri M, Lagalla R, Brancatelli G. Radiol Med; 2014 Apr 26; 119(4):215-21. PubMed ID: 24297581 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic value of perfusion CT in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment with sorafenib: comparison with mRECIST in longitudinal follow-up. Kaufmann S, Thaiss WM, Schulze M, Bitzer M, Lauer U, Nikolaou K, Horger M. Acta Radiol; 2018 Jul 26; 59(7):765-772. PubMed ID: 28927298 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Identification of responders to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma: is tumor volume measurement the way forward? Bargellini I, Scionti A, Mismas V, Masi G, Vivaldi C, Bartolozzi C, Sacco R. Oncology; 2014 Jul 26; 86(4):191-8. PubMed ID: 24800837 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]