These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

210 related items for PubMed ID: 2964778

  • 21. Survival at what cost? Origins and effects of the modern controversy on treating severely handicapped newborns.
    Reiser SJ.
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):199-213. PubMed ID: 3745836
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Killing "the handicapped" -- before and after birth.
    Field MA.
    Harv Womens Law J; 1993; 16():79-138. PubMed ID: 11652872
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Neonatologists judge the "Baby Doe" regulations.
    Kopelman LM, Irons TG, Kopelman AE.
    N Engl J Med; 1988 Mar 17; 318(11):677-83. PubMed ID: 3344019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn.
    Horan DJ, Balch BJ.
    Linacre Q; 1985 Feb 17; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. If not that way, what way?
    America (NY); 1986 Jul 26; 155(2):21. PubMed ID: 11658787
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Medical decision-making for defective infants by the Federal government.
    Taub S.
    Conn Med; 1983 Jul 26; 47(7):413-6. PubMed ID: 6224633
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Nondiscrimination on the basis of handicap--Office of the Secretary, HHS. Interim final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1983 Mar 07; 48(45):9630-2. PubMed ID: 10317299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Supreme Court asked to review application of Rehabilitation Act to medical decisions.
    Paulus SM.
    Issues Law Med; 1985 Jul 07; 1(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 2931399
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Selective nontreatment of handicapped newborns: an analysis.
    Crossley MA.
    Med Law; 1987 Jul 07; 6(6):499-524. PubMed ID: 2959834
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. The sanctity of life, the quality of life and the new 'Baby Doe' law.
    Johnstone BV.
    Linacre Q; 1985 Aug 07; 52(3):258-70. PubMed ID: 11649728
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Confusion over the language of the Baby Doe regulations.
    Bermel J.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Dec 07; 16(6):2. PubMed ID: 11643944
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Born to live or born to die: the handicapped newborn in New Jersey.
    Sarno JJ.
    Seton Hall Legis J; 1987 Dec 07; 11(1):201-22. PubMed ID: 11651899
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Ethical and legal issues in the care of the impaired newborn.
    Moreno JD.
    Clin Perinatol; 1987 Jun 07; 14(2):345-60. PubMed ID: 3595056
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Legal aspects of withholding treatment from handicapped newborns: substantive issues.
    Robertson JA.
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986 Jun 07; 11(2):215-30. PubMed ID: 3745837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. The Baby Doe regulations: views from perinatal social workers.
    York GY, Gallarno RM.
    J Perinatol; 1990 Sep 07; 10(3):312-6. PubMed ID: 2145406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Treatment of seriously ill and handicapped newborns.
    Fost N.
    Crit Care Clin; 1986 Jan 07; 2(1):145-59. PubMed ID: 11644122
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.