These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

229 related items for PubMed ID: 29662048

  • 1. "What Is a Step?" Differences in How a Step Is Detected among Three Popular Activity Monitors That Have Impacted Physical Activity Research.
    John D, Morton A, Arguello D, Lyden K, Bassett D.
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Apr 15; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 29662048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of Wrist- and Hip-Worn Activity Monitors When Meeting Step Guidelines.
    Nelson RK, Hasanaj K, Connolly G, Millen L, Muench J, Bidolli NSC, Preston MA, Montoye AHK.
    Prev Chronic Dis; 2022 Apr 14; 19():E18. PubMed ID: 35420981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison Between Wrist-Worn and Waist-Worn Accelerometry.
    Loprinzi PD, Smith B.
    J Phys Act Health; 2017 Jul 14; 14(7):539-545. PubMed ID: 28290761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of sampling rate on acceleration and counts of hip- and wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometers in children.
    Clevenger KA, Pfeiffer KA, Mackintosh KA, McNarry MA, Brønd J, Arvidsson D, Montoye AHK.
    Physiol Meas; 2019 Sep 30; 40(9):095008. PubMed ID: 31518999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Accuracy and precision of wrist-worn actigraphy for measuring steps taken during over-ground and treadmill walking in adults with Parkinson's disease.
    Cederberg KLJ, Jeng B, Sasaki JE, Lai B, Bamman M, Motl RW.
    Parkinsonism Relat Disord; 2021 Jul 30; 88():102-107. PubMed ID: 34171566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Use of accelerometry to classify activity beneficial to bone in premenopausal women.
    Stiles VH, Griew PJ, Rowlands AV.
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2013 Dec 30; 45(12):2353-61. PubMed ID: 23698245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Sampling frequency affects the processing of Actigraph raw acceleration data to activity counts.
    Brønd JC, Arvidsson D.
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2016 Feb 01; 120(3):362-9. PubMed ID: 26635347
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Children's physical activity assessed with wrist- and hip-worn accelerometers.
    Rowlands AV, Rennie K, Kozarski R, Stanley RM, Eston RG, Parfitt GC, Olds TS.
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Dec 01; 46(12):2308-16. PubMed ID: 24781890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Is Wrist Accelerometry Suitable for Threshold Scoring? A Comparison of Hip-Worn and Wrist-Worn ActiGraph Data in Low-Active Older Adults With Obesity.
    Fanning J, Miller ME, Chen SH, Davids C, Kershner K, Rejeski WJ.
    J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci; 2022 Dec 29; 77(12):2429-2434. PubMed ID: 34791237
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Accelerometer counts and raw acceleration output in relation to mechanical loading.
    Rowlands AV, Stiles VH.
    J Biomech; 2012 Feb 02; 45(3):448-54. PubMed ID: 22218284
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Intensity Thresholds on Raw Acceleration Data: Euclidean Norm Minus One (ENMO) and Mean Amplitude Deviation (MAD) Approaches.
    Bakrania K, Yates T, Rowlands AV, Esliger DW, Bunnewell S, Sanders J, Davies M, Khunti K, Edwardson CL.
    PLoS One; 2016 Feb 02; 11(10):e0164045. PubMed ID: 27706241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of Step Count Assessed Using Wrist- and Hip-Worn Actigraph GT3X in Free-Living Conditions in Young and Older Adults.
    Mandigout S, Lacroix J, Perrochon A, Svoboda Z, Aubourg T, Vuillerme N.
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2019 Feb 02; 6():252. PubMed ID: 31828072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cross-generational comparability of hip- and wrist-worn ActiGraph GT3X+, wGT3X-BT, and GT9X accelerometers during free-living in adults.
    Clevenger KA, Pfeiffer KA, Montoye AHK.
    J Sports Sci; 2020 Dec 02; 38(24):2794-2802. PubMed ID: 32755446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Step-counting accuracy of activity monitors in persons with Down syndrome.
    Bertapelli F, Curtis JS, Carlson B, Johnson M, Abadie B, Agiovlasitis S.
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2019 Jan 02; 63(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 30239068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparability of children's sedentary time estimates derived from wrist worn GENEActiv and hip worn ActiGraph accelerometer thresholds.
    Boddy LM, Noonan RJ, Kim Y, Rowlands AV, Welk GJ, Knowles ZR, Fairclough SJ.
    J Sci Med Sport; 2018 Oct 02; 21(10):1045-1049. PubMed ID: 29650338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Validating the accuracy of an activity monitor in a visually impaired older population.
    Bajaj R, Ramulu P, Dillon L, Jakobsen KB, Tiedemann A, Rogers K, Keay L.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Sep 02; 38(5):562-569. PubMed ID: 29984414
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of step outputs for waist and wrist accelerometer attachment sites.
    Tudor-Locke C, Barreira TV, Schuna JM.
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Apr 02; 47(4):839-42. PubMed ID: 25121517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.