These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

210 related items for PubMed ID: 2967829

  • 1. Pain in peripheral arteriography: an assessment of conventional versus ionic and non-ionic low-osmolality contrast agents.
    Murphy G, Campbell DR, Fraser DB.
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1988 Jun; 39(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 2967829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Pain during angiography: a randomized double-blind trial comparing ioxaglate and diatrizoate.
    Pathria M, Somers S, Gill G.
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1987 Mar; 38(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 2953734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Pulmonary arteriography: comparison of cough stimulation effects of diatrizoate and ioxaglate.
    Smith DC, Lois JF, Gomes AS, Maloney MD, Yahiku PY.
    Radiology; 1987 Mar; 162(3):617-8. PubMed ID: 3544028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Ionized calcium levels in coronary sinus blood during coronary angiography: effects of four contrast media.
    Mitsumori M, Hayakawa K, Torizuka T, Okuno Y, Monji T, Uwatoko H, Kitamura K, Abe M.
    Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):159-61. PubMed ID: 1549664
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Iohexol vs. ioxaglate in lower extremity angiography: a comparative randomized double-blind study in 80 patients.
    Krouwels MM, Overbosch EH, Guit GL.
    Eur J Radiol; 1996 May; 22(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 8793433
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of sodium-meglumine ioxaglate and iopromide in coronary angiography.
    Neiss AC, Barth P, Chastin I, Erdmann E.
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989 May; 32(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 2662884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Influence of low osmolality contrast media on electrophysiology and hemodynamics in coronary angiography: differences between an ionic (ioxaglate) and a nonionic (iohexol) agent.
    Vik-Mo H, Følling M, Barth P, Nordrehaug JE, Bjørkhaug A, Rosland GA.
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1990 Dec; 21(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 2276191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Tissue fluid shifts during renal arteriography with conventional and low osmolality agents.
    Morris TW, Harnish PP, Reece K, Katzberg RW.
    Invest Radiol; 1983 Dec; 18(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 6618823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Bronchial and intercostal angiography with ioxaglate and diatrizoate in man. A comparative investigation.
    Kumazaki T, Hosoi S, Sugawara K, Honda K.
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1984 Dec; 25(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 6731011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The effects of high (sodium meglumine diatrizoate, Renografin-76) and low osmolar (sodium meglumine ioxaglate, Hexabrix) radiographic contrast media on diastolic function during left ventriculography in patients.
    Aguirre FV, Pedersen W, Castello R, Deligonul U, Gudipati C, Serota H, Labovitz AJ, Kern MJ.
    Am Heart J; 1991 Mar; 121(3 Pt 1):848-57. PubMed ID: 2000752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Adult peripheral angiography. Results from four North American randomized clinical trials of ionic media versus iohexol.
    Wolf GL.
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983 Mar; 366():166-70. PubMed ID: 6382932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Comparative studies of diatrizoate, ioxaglate and iohexol as angiocardiographic contrast media].
    Esplugas E, Torrents A, Mauri J, Jara F.
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 1989 Mar; 42(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 2781110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Multicenter trial of ionic versus nonionic contrast media for cardiac angiography. The Iohexol Cooperative Study.
    Hill JA, Winniford M, Cohen MB, Van Fossen DB, Murphy MJ, Halpern EF, Ludbrook PA, Wexler L, Rudnick MR, Goldfarb S.
    Am J Cardiol; 1993 Oct 01; 72(11):770-5. PubMed ID: 8213508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Low osmolality contrast media in peripheral arteriography--clinical comparison of ioxaglate, iopamidol, iohexol and diatrizoate].
    Tajima H.
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Nov 25; 45(11):1407-20. PubMed ID: 4094879
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Pain in peripheral arteriography-a comparison of a low osmolality contrast medium with a conventional compound.
    Tillmann U, Adler R, Fuchs WA.
    Br J Radiol; 1979 Feb 25; 52(614):102-4. PubMed ID: 371733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Iohexol and ioxaglate in peripheral angiography.
    Stiris MG, Laerum F.
    Acta Radiol; 1987 Feb 25; 28(6):767-70. PubMed ID: 2962617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Percutaneous coronary angioscopic comparison of thrombus formation during percutaneous coronary angioplasty with ionic and nonionic low osmolality contrast media in unstable angina.
    Qureshi NR, den Heijer P, Crijns HJ.
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Sep 15; 80(6):700-4. PubMed ID: 9315572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Iohexol cerebral angiography. Multicenter clinical trial.
    Kido DK, Potts DG, Bryan RN, Norman D, Pelz DM, Fox AJ, Shaw DD.
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Sep 15; 20(1 Suppl):S55-7. PubMed ID: 3882617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.