These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

60 related items for PubMed ID: 296802

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Clinical performance of amalgam with high content of copper.
    Leinfelder KF.
    Gen Dent; 1981; 29(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 6948741
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Time-dependent corrosion potential of newly-placed admixed dental amalgam restorations.
    Sutow EJ, Maillet WA, Taylor JC, Hall GC, Millar M.
    Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):644-7. PubMed ID: 16901535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. [Mechanical properties and marginal adaptation of dispersed amalgams].
    Hirano S, Sugita H, Kanno Y, Hirasawa T.
    Tsurumi Shigaku; 1977 Dec; 3(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 284659
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. [The effects of high copper amalgams upon L strain fibroblasts in vitro (author's transl)].
    Isomura S.
    Shika Rikogaku Zasshi; 1980 Apr; 21(54):129-42. PubMed ID: 6936504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Two-year clinical evaluation of low creep dental amalgams.
    Laswell HR, Berry TG, Osborne JW.
    N Y State Dent J; 1980 Apr; 46(7):406-8. PubMed ID: 6931986
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. [On the clinical relevance of the dimensional behavior of silver amalgam. A comparative in vitro and in vivo study].
    Wirz J, Weidmann R, Schmidli F.
    Dtsch Stomatol (1990); 1991 Apr; 41(3):81-8. PubMed ID: 1814457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. [Marketing considerations in the use of amalgams and composites for posterior teeth. The considerable differences in cost, by gram or by volume, of composites for posterior teeth merit the attention of the practicing dentist].
    Perotti R, Brondino D.
    Minerva Stomatol; 1990 Dec; 39(12):1017-22. PubMed ID: 2092184
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Fluoride-releasing resin bonding of amalgam restorations in primary teeth: in vitro secondary caries effect.
    Hicks J, Milano M, Seybold S, García-Godoy F, Flaitz C.
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):361-4. PubMed ID: 12691270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. [Class II cavity for amalgam. Proposed new modifications related to material characteristics].
    Riccio C, Piccirillo P, Belnome G, Serpico R.
    Arch Stomatol (Napoli); 1990 Dec; 31(4):683-91. PubMed ID: 2100480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. [Contribution to the study of mechanical resistance of modern copper amalgam].
    Kovacs V.
    Riv Ital Stomatol; 1966 Oct; 21(10):1080-7. PubMed ID: 5227561
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 3.