These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

163 related items for PubMed ID: 29698234

  • 1. Sulphate removal from mine water with chemical, biological and membrane technologies.
    Kinnunen P, Kyllönen H, Kaartinen T, Mäkinen J, Heikkinen J, Miettinen V.
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Apr; 2017(1):194-205. PubMed ID: 29698234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The effect of magnesium on partial sulphate removal from mine water as gypsum.
    Tolonen ET, Rämö J, Lassi U.
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Aug 15; 159():143-146. PubMed ID: 26067895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The removal of sulphate from mine water by precipitation as ettringite and the utilisation of the precipitate as a sorbent for arsenate removal.
    Tolonen ET, Hu T, Rämö J, Lassi U.
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Oct 01; 181():856-862. PubMed ID: 27397845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Recovery of calcium carbonate from waste gypsum and utilization for remediation of acid mine drainage from coal mines.
    Mulopo J, Radebe V.
    Water Sci Technol; 2012 Oct 01; 66(6):1296-300. PubMed ID: 22828309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Byproduct recovery from reclaimed water reverse osmosis concentrate using lime and soda-ash treatment.
    Mohammadesmaeili F, Badr MK, Abbaszadegan M, Fox P.
    Water Environ Res; 2010 Apr 01; 82(4):342-50. PubMed ID: 20432652
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Geochemistry and pH control of seepage from Ni-Cu rich mine tailings at Selebi Phikwe, Botswana.
    Sracek O, Kříbek B, Mihaljevič M, Ettler V, Vaněk A, Penížek V, Filip J, Veselovský F, Bagai ZB.
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Jul 23; 190(8):482. PubMed ID: 30039179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. How to tackle the stringent sulfate removal requirements in mine water treatment-A review of potential methods.
    Runtti H, Tolonen ET, Tuomikoski S, Luukkonen T, Lassi U.
    Environ Res; 2018 Nov 23; 167():207-222. PubMed ID: 30053677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Tannery effluent as a carbon source for biological sulphate reduction.
    Boshoff G, Duncan J, Rose PD.
    Water Res; 2004 Jun 23; 38(11):2651-8. PubMed ID: 15207595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Production of aminated peat from branched polyethylenimine and glycidyltrimethylammonium chloride for sulphate removal from mining water.
    Gogoi H, Leiviskä T, Rämö J, Tanskanen J.
    Environ Res; 2019 Aug 23; 175():323-334. PubMed ID: 31150931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluation of in situ layers for treatment of acid mine drainage: a field comparison.
    Hulshof AH, Blowes DW, Gould WD.
    Water Res; 2006 May 23; 40(9):1816-26. PubMed ID: 16626781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.