These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

132 related items for PubMed ID: 2970485

  • 41. A multiple-channel cochlear implant: an evaluation using open-set CID sentences.
    Clark GM, Tong YC, Martin LF.
    Laryngoscope; 1981 Apr; 91(4):628-34. PubMed ID: 7219008
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Comparison of two cochlear implant speech-processing strategies.
    Clark GM, Tong YC, Dowell RC.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1984 Apr; 93(2 Pt 1):127-31. PubMed ID: 6546846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. Effects of Threshold Adjustment on Speech Perception in Nucleus Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Busby PA, Arora K.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Apr; 37(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 26671316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Investigating the MESA (multipoint electrotactile speech aid): the transmission of segmental features of speech.
    Sparks DW, Kuhl PK, Edmonds AE, Gray GP.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Jan; 63(1):246-57. PubMed ID: 632417
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Safety studies with the University of Melbourne multichannel electrotactile speech processor.
    Cowan RS, Blamey PJ, Alcántara JI, Blombery PA, Hopkins IJ, Whitford LA, Clark GM.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1992 Jan; 29(1):35-52. PubMed ID: 1740777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Multichannel compression hearing aids: effect of channel bandwidth on consonant and vowel identification by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Strelcyk O, Li N, Rodriguez J, Kalluri S, Edwards B.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1598-606. PubMed ID: 23464029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. Perception of amplitude envelope variations of pulsatile electrotactile stimuli.
    Blamey PJ, Alcantara JI, Cowan RS, Galvin KL, Sarant JZ, Clark GM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):1765-72. PubMed ID: 2148175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Measurement of performance of a peripheral vision lipreading aid.
    Kunov H, Ebrahimi D.
    Scand Audiol; 1991 Oct; 20(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 1842278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. Comparison of benefit from vibrotactile aid and cochlear implant for postlinguistically deaf adults.
    Skinner MW, Binzer SM, Fredrickson JM, Smith PG, Holden TA, Holden LK, Juelich MF, Turner BA.
    Laryngoscope; 1988 Oct; 98(10):1092-9. PubMed ID: 3172956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Open-set word identification by an adult with profound hearing impairment: integration of touch, aided hearing, and speechreading.
    Lynch MP, Eilers RE, Pero PJ.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Apr; 35(2):443-9. PubMed ID: 1533432
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Speech pattern hearing aids for the profoundly hearing impaired: speech perception and auditory abilities.
    Faulkner A, Ball V, Rosen S, Moore BC, Fourcin A.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2136-55. PubMed ID: 1597605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. A 12-consonant confusion study on a multiple-channel cochlear implant patient.
    Dowell RC, Martin LF, Tong YC, Clark GM, Seligman PM, Patrick JF.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Dec; 25(4):509-16. PubMed ID: 6897661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Speech perception results for children with implants with different levels of preoperative residual hearing.
    Cowan RS, DelDot J, Barker EJ, Sarant JZ, Pegg P, Dettman S, Galvin KL, Rance G, Hollow R, Dowell RC, Pyman B, Gibson WP, Clark GM.
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S125-6. PubMed ID: 9391629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. A longitudinal evaluation of the speech perception capabilities of children using multichannel tactile vocoders.
    Eilers RE, Cobo-Lewis AB, Vergara KC, Oller DK, Friedman KE.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Jun; 39(3):518-33. PubMed ID: 8783131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Speech perception without hearing.
    Bernstein LE, Demorest ME, Tucker PE.
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Feb; 62(2):233-52. PubMed ID: 10723205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Laboratory projects in tactile aids to lipreading.
    De Filippo CL.
    Ear Hear; 1984 Feb; 5(4):211-27. PubMed ID: 6468779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Spatial, tactile presentation of voice fundamental frequency as a supplement to lipreading: results of extended training with a single subject.
    Boothroyd A, Hnath-Chisolm T.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1988 Feb; 25(3):51-6. PubMed ID: 2970543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. Patient performance over eighteen months with the Ineraid intracochlear implant.
    Gray RF, Quinn SJ, Court I, Vanat Z, Baguley DM.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():275-7. PubMed ID: 7668667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Psychoacoustic Aspects of Speech Pattern Coding for the Deaf.
    Faulkner A, Fourcin AJ, Moore BCJ.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1990 Sep; 109(sup469):172-180. PubMed ID: 31905502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.