These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

263 related items for PubMed ID: 29708065

  • 21. Effects of Device Limitations on Acquisition of the /t/-/k/ Contrast in Children With Cochlear Implants.
    Johnson AA, Bentley DM, Munson B, Edwards J.
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(2):519-530. PubMed ID: 34456300
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Effects of age and hearing mechanism on spectral resolution in normal hearing and cochlear-implanted listeners.
    Horn DL, Dudley DJ, Dedhia K, Nie K, Drennan WR, Won JH, Rubinstein JT, Werner LA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):613. PubMed ID: 28147578
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. The Effect of Learning Modality and Auditory Feedback on Word Memory: Cochlear-Implanted versus Normal-Hearing Adults.
    Taitelbaum-Swead R, Icht M, Mama Y.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Mar; 28(3):222-231. PubMed ID: 28277213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Auditory Perception and Production of Speech Feature Contrasts by Pediatric Implant Users.
    Mahshie J, Core C, Larsen MD.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Mar; 36(6):653-63. PubMed ID: 26035142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Spectral Resolution and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implanted School-Aged Children.
    Noble AR, Halverson DM, Resnick J, Broncheau M, Rubinstein JT, Horn DL.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024 Jan; 170(1):230-238. PubMed ID: 37365946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Vowel intelligibility in children with cochlear implants: An acoustic and articulatory study.
    Turgeon C, Trudeau-Fisette P, Fitzpatrick E, Ménard L.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Oct; 101():87-96. PubMed ID: 28964317
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Spectral Contrast Effects Reveal Different Acoustic Cues for Vowel Recognition in Cochlear-Implant Users.
    Feng L, Oxenham AJ.
    Ear Hear; 2020 Oct; 41(4):990-997. PubMed ID: 31815819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Word Recognition Variability With Cochlear Implants: "Perceptual Attention" Versus "Auditory Sensitivity".
    Moberly AC, Lowenstein JH, Nittrouer S.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Oct; 37(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 26301844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Mandarin consonant contrast recognition among children with cochlear implants or hearing aids and normal-hearing children.
    Liu Q, Zhou N, Berger R, Huang D, Xu L.
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):471-6. PubMed ID: 23486352
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Spectrotemporal Modulation Discrimination in Infants With Normal Hearing.
    Noble AR, Resnick J, Broncheau M, Klotz S, Rubinstein JT, Werner LA, Horn DL.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Apr; 44(1):109-117. PubMed ID: 36218270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Single-Channel Focused Thresholds Relate to Vowel Identification in Pediatric and Adult Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Arjmandi MK, Jahn KN, Arenberg JG.
    Trends Hear; 2022 Apr; 26():23312165221095364. PubMed ID: 35505617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Cognitive factors contribute to speech perception in cochlear-implant users and age-matched normal-hearing listeners under vocoded conditions.
    O'Neill ER, Kreft HA, Oxenham AJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jul; 146(1):195. PubMed ID: 31370651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Effects of lexical characteristics and demographic factors on mandarin chinese open-set word recognition in children with cochlear implants.
    Liu H, Liu S, Wang S, Liu C, Kong Y, Zhang N, Li S, Yang Y, Han D, Zhang L.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Jul; 34(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 23086423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
    Peng SC, Tomblin JB, Turner CW.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. High- and Low-Performing Adult Cochlear Implant Users on High-Variability Sentence Recognition: Differences in Auditory Spectral Resolution and Neurocognitive Functioning.
    Tamati TN, Ray C, Vasil KJ, Pisoni DB, Moberly AC.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 May; 31(5):324-335. PubMed ID: 31580802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Spectro-temporal cues enhance modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Zheng Y, Escabí M, Litovsky RY.
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():45-54. PubMed ID: 28601530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Loizou PC, Poroy O.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1619-27. PubMed ID: 11572371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Sonority's Effect as a Surface Cue on Lexical Speech Perception of Children With Cochlear Implants.
    Hamza Y, Okalidou A, Kyriafinis G, van Wieringen A.
    Ear Hear; 2018 Sep; 39(5):992-1007. PubMed ID: 29517521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. How does aging affect recognition of spectrally degraded speech?
    Moberly AC, Vasil KJ, Wucinich TL, Safdar N, Boyce L, Roup C, Holt RF, Adunka OF, Castellanos I, Shafiro V, Houston DM, Pisoni DB.
    Laryngoscope; 2018 Nov; 128 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):. PubMed ID: 30325518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Audio-visual integration during speech perception in prelingually deafened Japanese children revealed by the McGurk effect.
    Tona R, Naito Y, Moroto S, Yamamoto R, Fujiwara K, Yamazaki H, Shinohara S, Kikuchi M.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 79(12):2072-8. PubMed ID: 26455920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.