These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

315 related items for PubMed ID: 29713653

  • 1. Comparison of clinical outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted versus conventional phacoemulsification.
    Ang RET, Quinto MMS, Cruz EM, Rivera MCR, Martinez GHA.
    Eye Vis (Lond); 2018; 5():8. PubMed ID: 29713653
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Clinical outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification: A retrospective study in a tertiary eye care center in South India.
    Medhi S, Senthil Prasad R, Pai A, Muthukrishnan GR, Mariammal A, Chitradevi R, Shekhar M.
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2022 Dec; 70(12):4300-4305. PubMed ID: 36453333
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison between refractive outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and standard phacoemulsification.
    Shaheen MS, AbouSamra A, Helaly HA, Said A, Elmassry A.
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan 02; 20(1):1. PubMed ID: 31898534
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery compared with phacoemulsification: the FACT non-inferiority RCT.
    Day AC, Burr JM, Bennett K, Hunter R, Bunce C, Doré CJ, Nanavaty MA, Balaggan KS, Wilkins MR.
    Health Technol Assess; 2021 Jan 02; 25(6):1-68. PubMed ID: 33511963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of clinical outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification in vitrectomized eyes - A prospective interventional study.
    Asif MI, Sinha R, Anjum S, Sahay P, Singh R, Agarwal T, Sharma N, Titiyal JS.
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2024 Sep 01; 72(9):1285-1290. PubMed ID: 38770603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of cumulative dispersed energy between conventional phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with two different lens fragmentation patterns.
    Lin HY, Kao ST, Chuang YJ, Chen S, Lin PJ.
    Lasers Med Sci; 2022 Mar 01; 37(2):843-848. PubMed ID: 33876322
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Astigmatic correction of simultaneous femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) with intrastromal arcuate keratotomy (ISAK) versus Toric intraocular Lens Impantation with conventional phacoemulsification.
    Kwon HJ, Lee H, Lee JA, Kim JY, Tchah H.
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Aug 14; 21(1):298. PubMed ID: 34391403
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparative evaluation of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional phacoemulsification in eyes with a shallow anterior chamber.
    Vasavada VA, Vasavada S, Vasavada AR, Vasavada V, Srivastava S.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 May 14; 45(5):547-552. PubMed ID: 31030773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Differences in energy and corneal endothelium between femtosecond laser-assisted and conventional cataract surgeries: prospective, intraindividual, randomized controlled trial.
    Bascaran L, Alberdi T, Martinez-Soroa I, Sarasqueta C, Mendicute J.
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2018 May 14; 11(8):1308-1316. PubMed ID: 30140634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Endothelial cell loss and refractive predictability in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery compared with conventional cataract surgery.
    Krarup T, Holm LM, la Cour M, Kjaerbo H.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Nov 14; 92(7):617-22. PubMed ID: 24888390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Preliminary evaluation of the femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in 300 cases].
    Wang Y, Bao X, Zhou Y, Xu R, Peng T, Sun M, Cao D, He L.
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Sep 14; 51(9):689-93. PubMed ID: 26693655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Presbyopic lens exchange (PRELEX) cataract surgery outcomes with implantation of a rotationally asymmetric refractive multifocal intraocular lens: femtosecond laser-assisted versus manual phacoemulsification.
    Žiak P, Halička J, Mojžiš P, Kapitánová K, Michal J, Piñero DP.
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec 14; 39(12):2875-2882. PubMed ID: 31168677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing 1-Year Outcomes of Low-Energy Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery versus Conventional Phacoemulsification.
    Liu YC, Setiawan M, Chin JY, Wu B, Ong HS, Lamoureux E, Mehta JS.
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2021 Dec 14; 8():811093. PubMed ID: 34977102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of Lens Fragmentation Patterns on Phacoemulsification Parameters and Postoperative Inflammation in Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery.
    Kaur M, Titiyal JS, Surve A, Falera R, Verma M.
    Curr Eye Res; 2018 Oct 14; 43(10):1228-1232. PubMed ID: 29874114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss Between Two Femtosecond Laser Platforms and Standard Phacoemulsification.
    Al-Mohtaseb Z, He X, Yesilirmak N, Waren D, Donaldson KE.
    J Refract Surg; 2017 Oct 01; 33(10):708-712. PubMed ID: 28991340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A randomised controlled trial comparing femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification surgery: 12-month results.
    Stanojcic N, Roberts HW, Wagh VK, Li JO, Naderi K, O'Brart DP.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2021 May 01; 105(5):631-638. PubMed ID: 32699049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.