These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

174 related items for PubMed ID: 29719261

  • 1. Negative Feedback Phosphorylation of Gγ Subunit Ste18 and the Ste5 Scaffold Synergistically Regulates MAPK Activation in Yeast.
    Choudhury S, Baradaran-Mashinchi P, Torres MP.
    Cell Rep; 2018 May 01; 23(5):1504-1515. PubMed ID: 29719261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. MAPK modulation of yeast pheromone signaling output and the role of phosphorylation sites in the scaffold protein Ste5.
    Winters MJ, Pryciak PM.
    Mol Biol Cell; 2019 Apr 01; 30(8):1037-1049. PubMed ID: 30726174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Mutational analysis suggests that activation of the yeast pheromone response mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway involves conformational changes in the Ste5 scaffold protein.
    Sette C, Inouye CJ, Stroschein SL, Iaquinta PJ, Thorner J.
    Mol Biol Cell; 2000 Nov 01; 11(11):4033-49. PubMed ID: 11071925
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Persistent activation by constitutive Ste7 promotes Kss1-mediated invasive growth but fails to support Fus3-dependent mating in yeast.
    Maleri S, Ge Q, Hackett EA, Wang Y, Dohlman HG, Errede B.
    Mol Cell Biol; 2004 Oct 01; 24(20):9221-38. PubMed ID: 15456892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. N-terminal intrinsic disorder is an ancestral feature of Gγ subunits that influences the balance between different Gβγ signaling axes in yeast.
    Su X, Pang YT, Li W, Gumbart JC, Kelley J, Torres M.
    J Biol Chem; 2023 Aug 01; 299(8):104947. PubMed ID: 37354971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The Ste5 scaffold directs mating signaling by catalytically unlocking the Fus3 MAP kinase for activation.
    Good M, Tang G, Singleton J, Reményi A, Lim WA.
    Cell; 2009 Mar 20; 136(6):1085-97. PubMed ID: 19303851
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Functional binding between Gbeta and the LIM domain of Ste5 is required to activate the MEKK Ste11.
    Feng Y, Song LY, Kincaid E, Mahanty SK, Elion EA.
    Curr Biol; 1998 Feb 26; 8(5):267-78. PubMed ID: 9501067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Cdc24 regulates nuclear shuttling and recruitment of the Ste5 scaffold to a heterotrimeric G protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Wang Y, Chen W, Simpson DM, Elion EA.
    J Biol Chem; 2005 Apr 01; 280(13):13084-96. PubMed ID: 15657049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Differential input by Ste5 scaffold and Msg5 phosphatase route a MAPK cascade to multiple outcomes.
    Andersson J, Simpson DM, Qi M, Wang Y, Elion EA.
    EMBO J; 2004 Jul 07; 23(13):2564-76. PubMed ID: 15192700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Mitogen-activated protein kinases with distinct requirements for Ste5 scaffolding influence signaling specificity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Flatauer LJ, Zadeh SF, Bardwell L.
    Mol Cell Biol; 2005 Mar 07; 25(5):1793-803. PubMed ID: 15713635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Control of MAPK signaling specificity by a conserved residue in the MEK-binding domain of the yeast scaffold protein Ste5.
    Schwartz MA, Madhani HD.
    Curr Genet; 2006 Jun 07; 49(6):351-63. PubMed ID: 16463042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Function of the MAPK scaffold protein, Ste5, requires a cryptic PH domain.
    Garrenton LS, Young SL, Thorner J.
    Genes Dev; 2006 Jul 15; 20(14):1946-58. PubMed ID: 16847350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. CDK and MAPK Synergistically Regulate Signaling Dynamics via a Shared Multi-site Phosphorylation Region on the Scaffold Protein Ste5.
    Repetto MV, Winters MJ, Bush A, Reiter W, Hollenstein DM, Ammerer G, Pryciak PM, Colman-Lerner A.
    Mol Cell; 2018 Mar 15; 69(6):938-952.e6. PubMed ID: 29547722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Mutational activation of the STE5 gene product bypasses the requirement for G protein beta and gamma subunits in the yeast pheromone response pathway.
    Hasson MS, Blinder D, Thorner J, Jenness DD.
    Mol Cell Biol; 1994 Feb 15; 14(2):1054-65. PubMed ID: 8289786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A membrane binding domain in the ste5 scaffold synergizes with gbetagamma binding to control localization and signaling in pheromone response.
    Winters MJ, Lamson RE, Nakanishi H, Neiman AM, Pryciak PM.
    Mol Cell; 2005 Oct 07; 20(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 16209942
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.