These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


212 related items for PubMed ID: 29721222

  • 1. The retention characteristics of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers with different retention protocols.
    Ramazanzadeh B, Ahrari F, Hosseini ZS.
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2018 Mar; 10(3):e224-e231. PubMed ID: 29721222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces.
    Littlewood SJ, Millett DT, Doubleday B, Bearn DR, Worthington HV.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Jan 29; 2016(1):CD002283. PubMed ID: 26824885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The effectiveness of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
    Rowland H, Hichens L, Williams A, Hills D, Killingback N, Ewings P, Clark S, Ireland AJ, Sandy JR.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec 29; 132(6):730-7. PubMed ID: 18068589
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Vacuum-formed retainer versus bonded retainer for dental stabilization in the mandible-a randomized controlled trial. Part I: retentive capacity 6 and 18 months after orthodontic treatment.
    Krämer A, Sjöström M, Hallman M, Feldmann I.
    Eur J Orthod; 2020 Nov 03; 42(5):551-558. PubMed ID: 31665279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Which orthodontic retention protocol should I implement? A critical assessment of a randomised controlled trial.
    Steegmans PAJ, Cavagnetto D, Reynders RAM.
    Evid Based Dent; 2022 Dec 03; 23(4):162-165. PubMed ID: 36526846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Acceptability comparison between Hawley retainers and vacuum-formed retainers in orthodontic adult patients: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial.
    Saleh M, Hajeer MY, Muessig D.
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug 01; 39(4):453-461. PubMed ID: 28430890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Objective evaluation of compliance after orthodontic treatment using Hawley or vacuum-formed retainers: A 2-center randomized controlled trial over a 3-month period.
    Vagdouti G, Karvouni E, Bitsanis E, Koletsi D.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Dec 01; 156(6):717-726.e2. PubMed ID: 31784005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A retrospective randomized double-blind comparison study of the effectiveness of Hawley vs vacuum-formed retainers.
    Barlin S, Smith R, Reed R, Sandy J, Ireland AJ.
    Angle Orthod; 2011 May 01; 81(3):404-9. PubMed ID: 21261482
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.