These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
337 related items for PubMed ID: 29722861
1. Early and long-term outcomes after manual and remote magnetic navigation-guided catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia. Qian P, De Silva K, Kumar S, Nadri F, Samanta R, Bhaskaran A, Ross D, Sivagangabalan G, Cooper M, Kizana E, Davis L, Denniss AR, Thiagalingam A, Thomas S, Kovoor P. Europace; 2018 May 01; 20(suppl_2):ii11-ii21. PubMed ID: 29722861 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical research: remote magnetic navigation vs. manually controlled catheter ablation of right ventricular outflow tract arrhythmias: a retrospective study. Shauer A, De Vries LJ, Akca F, Palazzolo J, Shurrab M, Lashevsky I, Tiong I, Singh SM, Newman D, Szili-Torok T, Crystal E. Europace; 2018 May 01; 20(suppl_2):ii28-ii32. PubMed ID: 29722855 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Catheter ablation of incisional atrial tachycardia using remote magnetic navigation in patients after heart surgery: comparison between acquired and congenital heart disease. Liu XY, Jacobsen PK, Pehrson S, Chen X. Europace; 2018 May 01; 20(suppl_2):ii33-ii39. PubMed ID: 29722858 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Remote magnetic navigation facilitates the ablations of frequent ventricular premature complexes originating from the outflow tract and the valve annulus as compared to manual control navigation. Qiu X, Zhang N, Luo Q, Liu A, Ji Y, Ye J, Lin C, Ling T, Chen K, Pan W, Zhao J, Jin Q, Wu L. Int J Cardiol; 2018 Sep 15; 267():94-99. PubMed ID: 29957265 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term outcomes of the current remote magnetic catheter navigation technique for ablation of atrial fibrillation. Yuan S, Holmqvist F, Kongstad O, Jensen SM, Wang L, Ljungström E, Hertervig E, Borgquist R. Scand Cardiovasc J; 2017 Dec 15; 51(6):308-315. PubMed ID: 28958165 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of remote magnetic navigation ablation and manual ablation of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia after failed manual ablation. Kawamura M, Scheinman MM, Tseng ZH, Lee BK, Marcus GM, Badhwar N. J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2017 Jan 15; 48(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 27314679 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. MAGNETIC VT study: a prospective, multicenter, post-market randomized controlled trial comparing VT ablation outcomes using remote magnetic navigation-guided substrate mapping and ablation versus manual approach in a low LVEF population. Di Biase L, Tung R, Szili-Torok T, Burkhardt JD, Weiss P, Tavernier R, Berman AE, Wissner E, Spear W, Chen X, Neužil P, Skoda J, Lakkireddy D, Schwagten B, Lock K, Natale A, MAGNETIC VT investigators. J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2017 Apr 15; 48(3):237-245. PubMed ID: 28064433 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Multicenter, randomized comparison between magnetically navigated and manually guided radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (the MagMa-AVNRT-trial). Reents T, Jilek C, Schuster P, Nölker G, Koch-Büttner K, Ammar-Busch S, Semmler V, Bourier F, Kottmaier M, Kornmayer M, Brooks S, Fichtner S, Kolb C, Deisenhofer I, Hessling G. Clin Res Cardiol; 2017 Dec 15; 106(12):947-952. PubMed ID: 28849269 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Remote magnetic versus manual catheter navigation for circumferential pulmonary vein ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Lüthje L, Vollmann D, Seegers J, Dorenkamp M, Sohns C, Hasenfuss G, Zabel M. Clin Res Cardiol; 2011 Nov 15; 100(11):1003-11. PubMed ID: 21706198 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Catheter Ablation of Focal Atrial Tachycardia Using Remote Magnetic Navigation. Liu XY, Jacobsen PK, Pehrson S, Chen X. J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Apr 15; 30(4):126-132. PubMed ID: 29245153 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]