These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

216 related items for PubMed ID: 29734085

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Altruism or obligation? The motivations and experience of women who donate oocytes to known recipients in assisted conception treatment: an interpretative phenomenological analysis study.
    Acharya S, Bryant L, Twiddy M.
    J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Mar; 38(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 28136000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Characterization of potential oocyte donors in Sweden.
    Svanberg AS, Lampic C, Bergh T, Lundkvist O.
    Hum Reprod; 2003 Oct; 18(10):2205-15. PubMed ID: 14507845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Young Women’s Attitudes Towards Modern Reproductive Practices: A Survey Study Assessing What Young Women Want.
    Druckenmiller S, DeVore S, Knopman JM, Noyes N.
    J Reprod Med; 2017 Oct; 62(3-4):111-18. PubMed ID: 30230301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Anonymity and secrecy options of recipient couples and donors, and ethnic origin influence in three types of oocyte donation.
    Laruelle C, Place I, Demeestere I, Englert Y, Delbaere A.
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Feb; 26(2):382-90. PubMed ID: 21149319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Worlds apart or two sides of the same coin? Attitudes, meanings, and motives of potential oocyte and sperm donors in Austria.
    Flatscher-Thöni M, Böttcher B, Geser W, Lampe A, Werner-Felmayer G, Voithofer C, Schusterschitz C.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 Feb; 37(2):287-296. PubMed ID: 31916077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Some psychological aspects of oocyte donation from known donors on altruistic basis.
    Khamsi F, Endman MW, Lacanna IC, Wong J.
    Fertil Steril; 1997 Aug; 68(2):323-7. PubMed ID: 9240264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Preferences and needs regarding future contact with donation offspring among identity-release gamete donors: results from the Swedish Study on Gamete Donation.
    Isaksson S, Sydsjö G, Skoog Svanberg A, Lampic C.
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Oct; 102(4):1160-6. PubMed ID: 25123638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Two decades after legislation on identifiable donors in Sweden: are recipient couples ready to be open about using gamete donation?
    Isaksson S, Skoog Svanberg A, Sydsjö G, Thurin-Kjellberg A, Karlström PO, Solensten NG, Lampic C.
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Apr; 26(4):853-60. PubMed ID: 21212053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Anonymous oocyte donation: a follow-up analysis of donors' experiences.
    Jordan CB, Belar CD, Williams RS.
    J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Jun; 25(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 15715037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Follow-up study of Finnish volunteer oocyte donors concerning their attitudes to oocyte donation.
    Söderström-Anttila V.
    Hum Reprod; 1995 Nov; 10(11):3073-6. PubMed ID: 8747077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Examining willingness to donate frozen oocytes among women of reproductive age.
    Duncan JP, Caughey LE, White KM.
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2023 Nov; 47(5):103294. PubMed ID: 37734120
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Attitudes among sperm donors in 1992 and 2002: a Danish questionnaire survey.
    Ernst E, Ingerslev HJ, Schou O, Stoltenberg M.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007 Nov; 86(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 17364308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Long-term follow-up of mental health and satisfaction in a Swedish sample of sperm and egg donors after open-identity donation.
    Sydsjö G, Lampic C, Bladh M, Nedstrand E, Svanberg AS.
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2023 Dec; 47(6):103417. PubMed ID: 37931369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Looking back: egg donors' retrospective evaluations of their motivations, expectations, and experiences during their first donation cycle.
    Kenney NJ, McGowan ML.
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):455-66. PubMed ID: 19022427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Framing Egg Donation: A Dichotomous Split.
    Webster KLW.
    Health Commun; 2018 Dec; 33(12):1445-1447. PubMed ID: 28850261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Egg donation--the donor's view: an aid to future recruitment.
    Byrd LM, Sidebotham M, Lieberman B.
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2002 Nov; 5(4):175-82. PubMed ID: 12477959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Oocyte donors' experience and expectations in a non-profit fertility care setting.
    Li Piani L, Tshilembi A, De Vos M, Buyse E, Ruttens S, Somigliana E, Tournaye H, Blockeel C.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2024 Sep; 41(9):2337-2347. PubMed ID: 39042340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Anonymous sperm donors' attitude towards donation and the release of identifying information.
    Mahieu F, Decleer W, Osmanagaoglu K, Provoost V.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Oct; 36(10):2007-2016. PubMed ID: 31463872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. To know or not to know? Dilemmas for women receiving unknown oocyte donation.
    Stuart-Smith SJ, Smith JA, Scott EJ.
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Jul; 27(7):2067-75. PubMed ID: 22493043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.