These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1150 related items for PubMed ID: 29735676

  • 1. Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.
    Gosden TP, Reddiex AJ, Chenoweth SF.
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May 22; 115(21):5498-5503. PubMed ID: 29735676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Testing the correlated response hypothesis for the evolution and maintenance of male mating preferences in Drosophila serrata.
    Gosden TP, Rundle HD, Chenoweth SF.
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Oct 22; 27(10):2106-12. PubMed ID: 25078542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. An evolutionary limit to male mating success.
    McGuigan K, Van Homrigh A, Blows MW.
    Evolution; 2008 Jun 22; 62(6):1528-37. PubMed ID: 18363864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Variation in male mate choice in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Edward DA, Chapman T.
    PLoS One; 2013 Jun 22; 8(2):e56299. PubMed ID: 23405271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Territory defense as a condition-dependent component of male reproductive success in Drosophila serrata.
    White AJ, Rundle HD.
    Evolution; 2015 Feb 22; 69(2):407-18. PubMed ID: 25491256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Testing for a genetic response to sexual selection in a wild Drosophila population.
    Gosden TP, Thomson JR, Blows MW, Schaul A, Chenoweth SF.
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jun 22; 29(6):1278-83. PubMed ID: 26914275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Similar preferences for ornamentation in opposite- and same-sex choice experiments.
    Cardoso GC, Leitão AV, Funghi C, Batalha HR, Lopes RJ, Mota PG.
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Dec 22; 27(12):2798-806. PubMed ID: 25371062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Female mate preferences in Drosophila simulans: evolution and costs.
    Sharma MD, Tregenza T, Hosken DJ.
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Aug 22; 23(8):1672-9. PubMed ID: 20546089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 58.