These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

251 related items for PubMed ID: 29735855

  • 21. Comparison of maxillary arch dimensional changes with passive and active self-ligation and conventional brackets in the permanent dentition: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.
    Fleming PS, Lee RT, Marinho V, Johal A.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 23910199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Alignment efficiency of Damon3 self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial.
    Scott P, DiBiase AT, Sherriff M, Cobourne MT.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):470.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18929262
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. An in vitro investigation of the influence of self-ligating brackets, low friction ligatures, and archwire on frictional resistance.
    Tecco S, Di Iorio D, Cordasco G, Verrocchi I, Festa F.
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):390-7. PubMed ID: 17702800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Force loss in archwire-guided tooth movement of conventional and self-ligating brackets.
    Montasser MA, El-Bialy T, Keilig L, Reimann S, Jäger A, Bourauel C.
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Feb; 36(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 23382468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Evaluation of incisor position and dental transverse dimensional changes using the Damon system.
    Vajaria R, BeGole E, Kusnoto B, Galang MT, Obrez A.
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Jul; 81(4):647-52. PubMed ID: 21446870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Friction of conventional and self-ligating brackets using a 10 bracket model.
    Tecco S, Festa F, Caputi S, Traini T, Di Iorio D, D'Attilio M.
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1041-5. PubMed ID: 16448253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Mechanical properties of coated superelastic archwires in conventional and self-ligating orthodontic brackets.
    Elayyan F, Silikas N, Bearn D.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 20152677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Dentoalveolar mandibular changes with self-ligating versus conventional bracket systems: A CBCT and dental cast study.
    Almeida MR, Futagami C, Conti AC, Oltramari-Navarro PV, Navarro Rde L.
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 20(3):50-7. PubMed ID: 26154456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Comparison of arch dimension changes in 1-phase vs 2-phase treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    Wortham JR, Dolce C, McGorray SP, Le H, King GJ, Wheeler TT.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 19577150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Comparison of the efficacy of tooth alignment among lingual and labial brackets: an in vitro study.
    Alobeid A, El-Bialy T, Reimann S, Keilig L, Cornelius D, Jäger A, Bourauel C.
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Nov 30; 40(6):660-665. PubMed ID: 29546390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Comparison of the force levels among labial and lingual self-ligating and conventional brackets in simulated misaligned teeth.
    Alobeid A, El-Bialy T, Khawatmi S, Dirk C, Jäger A, Bourauel C.
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug 01; 39(4):419-425. PubMed ID: 28339591
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. An in vivo study on the incidence and location of fracture in round orthodontic archwires.
    Guzman U, Jerrold L, Abdelkarim A.
    J Orthod; 2013 Dec 01; 40(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 24297962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Commercially available archwire forms compared with normal dental arch forms in a Japanese population.
    Oda S, Arai K, Nakahara R.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr 01; 137(4):520-7. PubMed ID: 20362913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Force levels in complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
    Montasser MA, El-Bialy T, Keilig L, Reimann S, Jäger A, Bourauel C.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr 01; 143(4):507-14. PubMed ID: 23561412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Comparison of galvanic corrosion potential of metal injection molded brackets to that of conventional metal brackets with nickel-titanium and copper nickel-titanium archwire combinations.
    Varma DP, Chidambaram S, Reddy KB, Vijay M, Ravindranath D, Prasad MR.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May 01; 14(3):488-95. PubMed ID: 24171995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Friction and archwire engagement in contemporary self-ligating appliance systems : An in vitro comparison.
    Greene M, Rizkalla A, Burkhart T, Mamandras A, Tassi A.
    J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Apr 01; 84(Suppl 2):65-73. PubMed ID: 34779866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Does the design of self-ligating brackets show different behavior in terms of friction?
    Tecco S, Marzo G, Di Bisceglie B, Crincoli V, Tetè S, Festa F.
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011 Apr 01; 12(4):330-9. PubMed ID: 22299106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Numeric modeling of torque capabilities of self-ligating and conventional brackets.
    Huang Y, Keilig L, Rahimi A, Reimann S, Eliades T, Jäger A, Bourauel C.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov 01; 136(5):638-43. PubMed ID: 19892278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Effect of dental arch convexity and type of archwire on frictional forces.
    Fourie Z, Ozcan M, Sandham A.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul 01; 136(1):14.e1-7; discussion 14-5. PubMed ID: 19577138
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. An in vitro study into the efficacy of complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
    Montasser MA, Keilig L, Bourauel C.
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Feb 01; 18(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 25264808
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.