These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
234 related items for PubMed ID: 29776719
1. Three-dimensional changes of proximal segments in facial asymmetry patients after bilateral vertical ramus osteotomy. Huh JW, Kim SY, Lee YB, Park JH, Jung HD, Jung YS. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Aug; 49(8):1036-1041. PubMed ID: 29776719 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Interferences between mandibular proximal and distal segments in orthognathic surgery for patients with asymmetric mandibular prognathism depending on different osteotomy techniques. Yang HJ, Lee WJ, Yi WJ, Hwang SJ. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 20382051 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Do patients treated with bimaxillary surgery have more stable condylar positions than those who have undergone single-jaw surgery? Kim YJ, Oh KM, Hong JS, Lee JH, Kim HM, Reyes M, Cevidanes LH, Park YH. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):2143-52. PubMed ID: 22115974 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes in temporomandibular joint and ramus after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular prognathism patients with and without asymmetry. Ueki K, Moroi A, Sotobori M, Ishihara Y, Marukawa K, Yoshizawa K, Kato K, Kawashiri S. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):821-7. PubMed ID: 22507292 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Postoperative stability of two common ramus osteotomy procedures for the correction of mandibular prognathism: A randomized controlled trial. Li DTS, Wang R, Wong NSM, Leung YY. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2022 Jan; 50(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 34627665 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of condylar morphology changes and position stability following unilateral and bilateral sagittal split mandibular ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular prognathism. Lin H, He Y, Feng Y, Huang F. Head Face Med; 2019 Jul 11; 15(1):18. PubMed ID: 31296246 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Skeletal stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with physiological positioning in patients with skeletal mandibular prognathism and facial asymmetry. Ohba S, Nakao N, Kawasaki T, Miura KI, Minamizato T, Koga Y, Yoshida N, Asahina I. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Oct 11; 54(8):920-926. PubMed ID: 27372232 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Maintaining the space between the mandibular ramus segments during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy does not influence the stability. Vamvanij N, Chinpaisarn C, Denadai R, Seo HJ, Pai BCJ, Lin HH, Lo LJ. J Formos Med Assoc; 2021 Sep 11; 120(9):1768-1776. PubMed ID: 33775535 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved lip esthetics in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry after isolated mandibular orthognathic surgery. Xu W, Tan H, Meng X, Huang Y, Cao L, Zheng L. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 May 11; 161(5):e407-e415. PubMed ID: 34996662 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-Dimensional Evaluation of the Postsurgical Stability of Mandibular Setback With the Surgery-First Approach: Comparison Between Patients With Symmetry and Asymmetry. Sun L, Lee KM. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jul 11; 77(7):1469.e1-1469.e11. PubMed ID: 31004589 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]