These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


144 related items for PubMed ID: 2977791

  • 21. Cardiac applications of digital radiography.
    Vogel RA, Mancini GB.
    Cardiol Clin; 1985 Feb; 3(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 3910233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Digital subtraction angiography of the coronary arteries.
    Neeley JP, Vannier MW, Gutierrez FR, Spadaro JJ.
    Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1985 Feb; 25(1):23-60. PubMed ID: 3902366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Digital subtraction angiographic assessment of the coronary arteries and coronary flow reserve.
    Vogel RA, Mancini GB, Bates ER.
    Int J Card Imaging; 1985 Feb; 1(4):225-32. PubMed ID: 3916437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. [Quantitative analysis of myocardial perfusion by digital subtraction angiography].
    Takeda T, Matsuda M, Akatsuka T, Kuwako K, Ogawa T, Ajisaka R, Sugishita Y, Ito I, Akisada M.
    J Cardiogr; 1985 Mar; 15(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 3905993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. [Myocardial perfusion detected using digital subtraction angiography as compared with X-ray CT and Tl-201 myocardial imaging].
    Ohta M, Fukuoka H, Naito H, Nishimura T, Kimura K, Takamiya M, Ohara K, Kozuka T, Ohe M.
    J Cardiogr Suppl; 1987 Mar; 12():69-79. PubMed ID: 3323326
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Effects of nifedipine on coronary perfusion; recent assessment by parametric digital subtraction.
    Hayward R, Hunter GJ, Swanton H.
    Eur Heart J; 1987 Nov; 8 Suppl K():1-7. PubMed ID: 3330027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. [Digital subtraction angiography for the assessment of myocardial perfusion].
    Felder LM, Hess OM, Vassalli F, Jiang Z, Grimm J, Krayenbühl HP.
    Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax; 1992 Oct 20; 81(43):1277-80. PubMed ID: 1411017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Reproducibility of digital subtraction fluoroscopic readings for coronary artery calcification.
    Tang W, Young E, Detrano R, Doherty T, French W, Brundage B.
    Invest Radiol; 1994 Feb 20; 29(2):147-9. PubMed ID: 8169088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Digital subtraction coronary angiography using high-pass temporal filtration: a comparison with cineangiography.
    Bray BE, Anderson FL, Hardin CW, Kruger RA, Sutton RB, Nelson JA.
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1985 Feb 20; 11(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 3884167
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Evaluation of myocardial perfusion abnormality by profile analysis for digital subtraction angiogram.
    Takeda T, Matsuda M, Ogawa T, Ajisaka R, Kakihana M, Sugishita Y, Ito I, Akisada M, Akatsuka T.
    Angiology; 1989 Mar 20; 40(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 2644878
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.