These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
268 related items for PubMed ID: 29785975
1. Utility of otoacoustic emissions and olivocochlear reflex in predicting vulnerability to noise-induced inner ear damage. Blioskas S, Tsalighopoulos M, Psillas G, Markou K. Noise Health; 2018; 20(94):101-111. PubMed ID: 29785975 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison of methods for early detection of noise vulnerability of the inner ear. Amplitude reduction of otoacoustic emissions are most sensitive at submaximal noise impulse exposure]. Plinkert PK, Hemmert W, Zenner HP. HNO; 1995 Feb; 43(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 7713771 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Otoacoustic emissions in early noise-induced hearing loss. Shupak A, Tal D, Sharoni Z, Oren M, Ravid A, Pratt H. Otol Neurotol; 2007 Sep; 28(6):745-52. PubMed ID: 17721363 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Detecting incipient inner-ear damage from impulse noise with otoacoustic emissions. Marshall L, Lapsley Miller JA, Heller LM, Wolgemuth KS, Hughes LM, Smith SD, Kopke RD. J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):995-1013. PubMed ID: 19206875 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A longitudinal study of changes in evoked otoacoustic emissions and pure-tone thresholds as measured in a hearing conservation program. Lapsley Miller JA, Marshall L, Heller LM. Int J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 43(6):307-22. PubMed ID: 15457813 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Occupational exposure to noise decreases otoacoustic emission efferent suppression. Sliwinska-Kowalska M, Kotylo P. Int J Audiol; 2002 Mar; 41(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 12212856 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Otoacoustic-emission-based medial-olivocochlear reflex assays for humans. Marshall L, Lapsley Miller JA, Guinan JJ, Shera CA, Reed CM, Perez ZD, Delhorne LA, Boege P. J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Nov; 136(5):2697-713. PubMed ID: 25373970 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Otoacoustic emissions and medial olivocochlear suppression during auditory recovery from acoustic trauma in humans. Veuillet E, Martin V, Suc B, Vesson JF, Morgon A, Collet L. Acta Otolaryngol; 2001 Jan; 121(2):278-83. PubMed ID: 11349796 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of the noise-protective action of the olivocochlear efferents in humans. Wolpert S, Heyd A, Wagner W. Audiol Neurootol; 2014 Jan; 19(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 24281009 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [The evaluation of usefullnes of hearing protectors while exposure to impulse noise]. Miłoński J, Olszewski J. Otolaryngol Pol; 2007 Jan; 61(5):877-9. PubMed ID: 18552039 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of cochlear function in patients with tinnitus using spontaneous and transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions. Santaolalla Montoya F, Ibargüen AM, del Rey AS, Fernández JM. J Otolaryngol; 2007 Oct; 36(5):296-302. PubMed ID: 17963669 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Otoacoustic emissions in a hearing conservation program: general applicability in longitudinal monitoring and the relation to changes in pure-tone thresholds. Helleman HW, Jansen EJ, Dreschler WA. Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):410-9. PubMed ID: 20192875 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Contralateral suppression of transient otoacoustic emissions and sentence recognition in noise in young adults. Stuart A, Butler AK. J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Oct; 23(9):686-96. PubMed ID: 23072961 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]