These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

170 related items for PubMed ID: 2978991

  • 1. [The correlation of hysterosalpingography, Rubin tests and celiotomy with laparoscopic diagnoses in tubal permeability].
    Nava y Sánchez RM, Cepeda Ruvalcaba A, Díaz Esponda JC, Madero Cervera JI, Alemán Hernández D, López-Ortíz CZ.
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1987 Oct; 55():271-6. PubMed ID: 2978991
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Spastic lock of fallopian tube in laparoscopic representation (author's transl)].
    Lürmann K.
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1979 Oct; 101(18):1195-9. PubMed ID: 161128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of tubal patency in post-abortal infertile women.
    Roopnarinesingh S, Ramsewak S, Gopeesingh T, McDougal J.
    West Indian Med J; 1983 Sep; 32(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 6227140
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Prediction of laparoscopic surgery outcomes in tubal infertility.
    Kudaiberdieva A, Kangeldieva A.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Oct; 45(5):460-3. PubMed ID: 16171490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Information obtainable from hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy and importance of tubal factor in sterile patients (author's transl)].
    Mälzer G, Piskazeck K, Felker A, Hentschel W.
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1981 Oct; 103(7):397-402. PubMed ID: 6455892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in infertile women].
    Vasiljević M, Ganović R, Jovanović R, Marković A.
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1996 Oct; 124(5-6):135-8. PubMed ID: 9102833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Comparative study on assessment of tubal patency among tubal insufflation, hydrotubation, hysterosalpingography and chromotubation under laparoscopy].
    Zuo W, Wang P.
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1996 Jan; 31(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 8758816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [A comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in the evaluation of peritubal adhesions and tubal patency].
    Tanaka T, Fujimoto S, Oikawa M, Sakuragi N, Ichinoe K.
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1987 Jan; 39(1):161-4. PubMed ID: 2950187
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Functional tubal obstructions: a great deceiver].
    Gironnet I, Moniez V, Brun G.
    Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1987 Jun; 82(6):415-7. PubMed ID: 2956664
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Laparoscopy and hysterosalpingography in the assessment of tubal patency.
    Hutchins CJ.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Mar; 49(3):325-7. PubMed ID: 138808
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [A comparative study between hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in evaluating female infertility].
    Tsankova M, Nalbanski B, Borisov I, Borisov S.
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2000 Mar; 39(1):20-2. PubMed ID: 10826330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Hysterosalpingography combined with hysteroscopy-laporoscopy in diagnosing female infertility].
    Luo XM, Yang YM, Shi Q.
    Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2003 Aug; 28(4):421-3. PubMed ID: 14653137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [The significance of laparoscopy for diagnosis of tubal sterility].
    Frengenheim H, Hauber KP.
    Fortschr Androl; 1974 Aug; 3():97-102. PubMed ID: 4283369
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Hysterosalpingography with simultaneous intrauterine pressure measurement. A contribution to invasive sterility diagnosis].
    Eckardt R, Niederlag W.
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1986 Aug; 108(9):570-5. PubMed ID: 3727857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Triple evaluation of tubal patency.
    Portuondo JA, Echanojauregui AD, Peña Irala J, Calonge J.
    Int J Fertil; 1980 Aug; 25(4):307-10. PubMed ID: 6114055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Comparative evaluation of the use of endoscopic and x-ray contrast study methods in diagnosing tubular sterility].
    Boginskaia LN, Zhilkin GV, Al' Makusi IIu.
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1981 Feb; (2):12-4. PubMed ID: 6452829
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Comparison of hysterosalpingographic and laparoscopic findings in tubal factor of sterility (author's transl)].
    Smiljaníc N, Ciglar S.
    Jugosl Ginekol Opstet; 1981 Dec; 21(5-6):113-6. PubMed ID: 6212723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of tubal patency assessment during microlaparoscopy and laparoscopy, and its compatibility with previous histerosalpingography results.
    Marianowski P, Kaminski P, Wielgos M, Szymusik I, Ludwikowski G.
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2007 Apr; 28(2):149-52. PubMed ID: 17435672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Tubal evaluation in the investigation of subfertility: a structured comparison of tests.
    Papaioannou S, Bourdrez P, Varma R, Afnan M, Mol BW, Coomarasamy A.
    BJOG; 2004 Dec; 111(12):1313-21. PubMed ID: 15663113
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Assessment of tubal factor contribution to female infertility in a low resource setting (southwest Nigeria): hysterosalpingography vs laparoscopy.
    Okunlola MA, Adebayo OJ, Odukogbe AA, Morhason-Bello IO, Owonikoko KM.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Nov; 25(8):803-4. PubMed ID: 16368589
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.