These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

360 related items for PubMed ID: 29807735

  • 1. Evaluation of the fit of metal copings fabricated using stereolithography.
    Kim SB, Kim NH, Kim JH, Moon HS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):693-698. PubMed ID: 29807735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of production method on surface roughness, marginal and internal fit, and retention of cobalt-chromium single crowns.
    Lövgren N, Roxner R, Klemendz S, Larsson C.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 28024818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of the marginal fit of metal copings fabricated by using 3 different CAD-CAM techniques: Milling, stereolithography, and 3D wax printer.
    Khaledi AA, Farzin M, Akhlaghian M, Pardis S, Mir N.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):81-86. PubMed ID: 31672421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital scanning procedures.
    Lee B, Oh KC, Haam D, Lee JH, Moon HS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 29428522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Clinical marginal and internal fit of metal ceramic crowns fabricated with a selective laser melting technology.
    Huang Z, Zhang L, Zhu J, Zhang X.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):623-7. PubMed ID: 25794918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effect of manufacturing techniques on the marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium implant-supported multiunit frameworks.
    Akçin ET, Güncü MB, Aktaş G, Aslan Y.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):715-720. PubMed ID: 30017153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Marginal and internal adaptation of milled cobalt-chromium copings.
    Kane LM, Chronaios D, Sierraalta M, George FM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Nov; 114(5):680-5. PubMed ID: 26182851
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A microcomputed tomography evaluation of the marginal fit of cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated by new manufacturing techniques and alloy systems.
    Kim EH, Lee DH, Kwon SM, Kwon TY.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 27677219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The Effect of Milling Metal Versus Milling Wax on Implant Framework Retention and Adaptation.
    Ghodsi S, Pirmoazen S, Beyabanaki E, Rostami M, Alikhasi M.
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e739-e743. PubMed ID: 29855135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Marginal and internal fit of metal copings fabricated with rapid prototyping and conventional waxing.
    Farjood E, Vojdani M, Torabi K, Khaledi AA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jan; 117(1):164-170. PubMed ID: 27460320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of repeated ceramic firings on the marginal and internal adaptation of metal-ceramic restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM technologies.
    Kocaağaoğlu H, Albayrak H, Kilinc HI, Gümüs HÖ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Nov; 118(5):672-677. PubMed ID: 28385435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effects of repeated firing on the marginal accuracy of Co-Cr copings fabricated by selective laser melting.
    Zeng L, Zhang Y, Liu Z, Wei B.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Feb; 113(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 25444279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Accuracy of CAD-CAM milling versus conventional lost-wax casting for single metal copings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yang J, Li H.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):51-58. PubMed ID: 35788274
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of the Internal and Marginal Discrepancies of Co-Cr Metal Copings Prepared via CAD/CAM and Conventional Casting.
    Dayan SC, Kiseri B, Gencel B, Kurt A.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2019 Feb 22; 27(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 30762994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluating the marginal fit of zirconia copings with digital impressions with an intraoral digital scanner.
    An S, Kim S, Choi H, Lee JH, Moon HS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov 22; 112(5):1171-5. PubMed ID: 24951386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Selective laser sintering versus conventional lost-wax casting for single metal copings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yang J, Li H, Xu L, Wang Y.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov 22; 128(5):897-904. PubMed ID: 33789799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of marginal/internal fit of chrome-cobalt crowns: Direct laser metal sintering versus computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing.
    Gunsoy S, Ulusoy M.
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2016 Nov 22; 19(5):636-44. PubMed ID: 27538553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Evaluation of the Marginal and Internal Fit of Implant-Supported Metal Copings Fabricated with 3 Different Techniques: An In Vitro Study.
    Yildirim B, Paken G.
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Mar 22; 28(3):315-320. PubMed ID: 30667169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Influence of manufacturing technique on marginal fit of cobalt chromium restorations: An in-vitro Study.
    Sarda AS, Bedia SV.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2021 Mar 22; 32(4):495-499. PubMed ID: 35645078
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison and evaluation of marginal and internal gaps in cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated using subtractive and additive manufacturing.
    Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC.
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jan 22; 62(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 28663024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.