These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Comparison of Corneal Dynamic and Tomographic Analysis in Normal, Forme Fruste Keratoconic, and Keratoconic Eyes. Wang YM, Chan TCY, Yu M, Jhanji V. J Refract Surg; 2017 Sep 01; 33(9):632-638. PubMed ID: 28880339 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Integration of Scheimpflug-Based Corneal Tomography and Biomechanical Assessments for Enhancing Ectasia Detection. Ambrósio R, Lopes BT, Faria-Correia F, Salomão MQ, Bühren J, Roberts CJ, Elsheikh A, Vinciguerra R, Vinciguerra P. J Refract Surg; 2017 Jul 01; 33(7):434-443. PubMed ID: 28681902 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical Analysis of Subclinical Keratoconus With Normal Topographic, Topometric, and Tomographic Findings. Koc M, Aydemir E, Tekin K, Inanc M, Kosekahya P, Kiziltoprak H. J Refract Surg; 2019 Apr 01; 35(4):247-252. PubMed ID: 30984982 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Properties After Corneal Cross-linking for Keratoconus: A 4-Year Longitudinal Study. Sedaghat MR, Momeni-Moghaddam H, Ambrósio R, Roberts CJ, Yekta AA, Danesh Z, Reisdorf S, Khabazkhoob M, Heidari HR, Sadeghi J. J Refract Surg; 2018 Dec 01; 34(12):849-856. PubMed ID: 30540368 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Corneal Deformation Parameters in Keratoconic and Normal Eyes Using a Non-contact Tonometer With a Dynamic Ultra-High-Speed Scheimpflug Camera. Mercer RN, Waring GO, Roberts CJ, Jhanji V, Wang Y, Filho JS, Hemings RA, Rocha KM. J Refract Surg; 2017 Sep 01; 33(9):625-631. PubMed ID: 28880338 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the morphological and biomechanical characteristics of keratoconus, forme fruste keratoconus, and normal corneas. Guo LL, Tian L, Cao K, Li YX, Li N, Yang WQ, Jie Y. Semin Ophthalmol; 2021 Nov 17; 36(8):671-678. PubMed ID: 33734947 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia and Corvis ST parameters for subclinical keratoconus. Song Y, Feng Y, Qu M, Ma Q, Tian H, Li D, He R. Int Ophthalmol; 2023 May 17; 43(5):1465-1475. PubMed ID: 36255612 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical Evaluation of Topographically and Tomographically Normal Fellow Eyes of Patients With Keratoconus. Asroui L, Dagher SA, Elsheikh A, Lopes BT, Roberts CJ, Assouad M, Awwad ST. J Refract Surg; 2022 May 17; 38(5):318-325. PubMed ID: 35536713 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Ectasia Detection in Early Keratoconus Using Scheimpflug-Based Corneal Tomography and Biomechanical Assessments. Wallace HB, Vellara HR, Gokul A, McGhee CNJ, Meyer JJ. Cornea; 2023 Dec 01; 42(12):1528-1535. PubMed ID: 36973879 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Keratoconus Screening With Dynamic Biomechanical In Vivo Scheimpflug Analyses: A Proof-of-Concept Study. Steinberg J, Amirabadi NE, Frings A, Mehlan J, Katz T, Linke SJ. J Refract Surg; 2017 Nov 01; 33(11):773-778. PubMed ID: 29117418 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]