These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

158 related items for PubMed ID: 29906239

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Correlation of the clinical and physical image quality in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system.
    Moore CS, Wood TJ, Beavis AW, Saunderson JR.
    Br J Radiol; 2013 Jul; 86(1027):20130077. PubMed ID: 23568362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Effect of high- and low-energy entrance surface dose allocation ratio for two-shot dual-energy subtraction imaging on low-contrast resolution.
    Kanzaki Y, Kuramoto T, Takarabe S, Shibayama Y, Yoshikawa H, Kato T.
    Radiography (Lond); 2023 Jan; 29(1):240-246. PubMed ID: 36608378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Survey of chest radiography systems: Any link between contrast detail measurements and visual grading analysis?
    Rodríguez Pérez S, Marshall NW, Binst J, Coolen J, Struelens L, Bosmans H.
    Phys Med; 2020 Aug; 76():62-71. PubMed ID: 32599376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection.
    Bacher K, Smeets P, De Hauwere A, Voet T, Duyck P, Verstraete K, Thierens H.
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 16442770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Visual grading analysis of digital neonatal chest phantom X-ray images: Impact of detector type, dose and image processing on image quality.
    Smet MH, Breysem L, Mussen E, Bosmans H, Marshall NW, Cockmartin L.
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):2951-2959. PubMed ID: 29460076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Development of a chest digital tomosynthesis R/F system and implementation of low-dose GPU-accelerated compressed sensing (CS) image reconstruction.
    Choi S, Lee H, Lee D, Choi S, Lee CL, Kwon W, Shin J, Seo CW, Kim HJ.
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1871-1888. PubMed ID: 29500855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Correlation between the signal-to-noise ratio improvement factor (KSNR) and clinical image quality for chest imaging with a computed radiography system.
    Moore CS, Wood TJ, Saunderson JR, Beavis AW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec 07; 60(23):9047-58. PubMed ID: 26540441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Image Quality Evaluation of a Digital Radiography System Made in Thailand.
    Techavipoo U, Sinsuebphon N, Prompalit S, Thongvigitmanee S, Narkbuakaew W, Kiang-Ia A, Srivongsa T, Thajchayapong P, Chaumrattanakul U.
    Biomed Res Int; 2021 Dec 07; 2021():3102673. PubMed ID: 34869760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Digital radiography image quality evaluation using various phantoms and software.
    Tsalafoutas IA, AlKhazzam S, Tsapaki V, AlNaemi H, Kharita MH.
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Dec 07; 23(12):e13823. PubMed ID: 36345212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Investigation of optimum energies for chest imaging using film-screen and computed radiography.
    Honey ID, Mackenzie A, Evans DS.
    Br J Radiol; 2005 May 07; 78(929):422-7. PubMed ID: 15845936
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. An ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Månsson LG, Kheddache S, Börjesson J, Mattsson S, Schlossman D.
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov 07; 9(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 2591385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. A dual-view digital tomosynthesis imaging technique for improved chest imaging.
    Zhong Y, Lai CJ, Wang T, Shaw CC.
    Med Phys; 2015 Sep 07; 42(9):5238-51. PubMed ID: 26328973
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Optimisation strategies introduced for CR at health care centres in Estonia.
    Kepler K, Vladimirov A.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008 Sep 07; 129(1-3):127-31. PubMed ID: 18252852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Evaluation of a software package for automated quality assessment of contrast detail images--comparison with subjective visual assessment.
    Pascoal A, Lawinski CP, Honey I, Blake P.
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec 07; 50(23):5743-57. PubMed ID: 16306665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Flat panel digital radiography compared with storage phosphor computed radiography: assessment of dose versus image quality in phantom studies.
    Fischbach F, Ricke J, Freund T, Werk M, Spors B, Baumann C, Pech MJ, Felix R.
    Invest Radiol; 2002 Nov 07; 37(11):609-14. PubMed ID: 12393973
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. The advantage of digital tomosynthesis for pulmonary nodule detection concerning influence of nodule location and size: a phantom study.
    Kim EY, Bista AB, Kim T, Park SY, Park KJ, Kang DK, Sun JS.
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Sep 07; 72(9):796.e1-796.e8. PubMed ID: 28454640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. [Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization].
    Redlich U, Hoeschen C, Effenberger O, Fessel A, Preuss H, Reissberg S, Scherlach C, Döhring W.
    Rofo; 2005 Feb 07; 177(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 15666237
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. [Evaluation of Detectability for Patient's Movement in Portable Chest Radiography: Comparison of Visual Detection and Motion Detection Software].
    Ono T, Ichikawa H, Kato T.
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2022 Aug 20; 78(8):838-845. PubMed ID: 35793953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.