These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

980 related items for PubMed ID: 29908774

  • 1. Blastocyst development rate influences implantation and live birth rates of similarly graded euploid blastocysts.
    Irani M, O'Neill C, Palermo GD, Xu K, Zhang C, Qin X, Zhan Q, Clarke RN, Ye Z, Zaninovic N, Rosenwaks Z.
    Fertil Steril; 2018 Jul 01; 110(1):95-102.e1. PubMed ID: 29908774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Does maternal age at retrieval influence the implantation potential of euploid blastocysts?
    Irani M, Zaninovic N, Rosenwaks Z, Xu K.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr 01; 220(4):379.e1-379.e7. PubMed ID: 30521800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Morphologic grading of euploid blastocysts influences implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates.
    Irani M, Reichman D, Robles A, Melnick A, Davis O, Zaninovic N, Xu K, Rosenwaks Z.
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Mar 01; 107(3):664-670. PubMed ID: 28069172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts.
    Capalbo A, Rienzi L, Cimadomo D, Maggiulli R, Elliott T, Wright G, Nagy ZP, Ubaldi FM.
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Jun 01; 29(6):1173-81. PubMed ID: 24578475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: a consecutive case series study.
    Minasi MG, Colasante A, Riccio T, Ruberti A, Casciani V, Scarselli F, Spinella F, Fiorentino F, Varricchio MT, Greco E.
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Oct 01; 31(10):2245-54. PubMed ID: 27591227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Worth the wait? Day 7 blastocysts have lower euploidy rates but similar sustained implantation rates as Day 5 and Day 6 blastocysts.
    Tiegs AW, Sun L, Patounakis G, Scott RT.
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep 29; 34(9):1632-1639. PubMed ID: 31402381
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Live birth rate following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer is higher with blastocysts expanded on Day 5 than on Day 6.
    Ferreux L, Bourdon M, Sallem A, Santulli P, Barraud-Lange V, Le Foll N, Maignien C, Chapron C, de Ziegler D, Wolf JP, Pocate-Cheriet K.
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Mar 01; 33(3):390-398. PubMed ID: 29394365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Hatching status before embryo transfer is not correlated with implantation rate in chromosomally screened blastocysts.
    Rodriguez-Purata J, Gingold J, Lee J, Whitehouse M, Slifkin R, Briton-Jones C, Copperman A, Sandler B.
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov 01; 31(11):2458-2470. PubMed ID: 27619770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effect of Embryo Developmental Stage, Morphological Grading, and Ploidy Status on Live Birth Rate in Frozen Cycles of Single Blastocyst Transfer.
    Ji H, Zhou Y, Cao S, Zhang J, Ling X, Zhao C, Shen R.
    Reprod Sci; 2021 Apr 01; 28(4):1079-1091. PubMed ID: 33174188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Associations of blastocyst features, trophectoderm biopsy and other laboratory practice with post-warming behavior and implantation.
    Cimadomo D, Capalbo A, Levi-Setti PE, Soscia D, Orlando G, Albani E, Parini V, Stoppa M, Dovere L, Tacconi L, Ievoli E, Maggiulli R, Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L.
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov 01; 33(11):1992-2001. PubMed ID: 30265329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Is there an optimal window of time for transferring single frozen-thawed euploid blastocysts? A cohort study of 1170 embryo transfers.
    An BGL, Chapman M, Tilia L, Venetis C.
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Nov 24; 37(12):2797-2807. PubMed ID: 36305795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. What is the reproductive potential of day 7 euploid embryos?
    Hernandez-Nieto C, Lee JA, Slifkin R, Sandler B, Copperman AB, Flisser E.
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep 29; 34(9):1697-1706. PubMed ID: 31398251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Association between morphologic grading and implantation rate of Euploid blastocyst.
    Lou H, Li N, Guan Y, Zhang Y, Hao D, Cui S.
    J Ovarian Res; 2021 Jan 23; 14(1):18. PubMed ID: 33485390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of Blastocyst Morphology and Developmental Rate on Euploidy and Live Birth Rates in Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy Cycles With Single-Embryo Transfer.
    Li N, Guan Y, Ren B, Zhang Y, Du Y, Kong H, Zhang Y, Lou H.
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2022 Jan 23; 13():858042. PubMed ID: 35498424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Morphological quality on Day 3 affects the pregnancy outcomes of low-quality euploid blastocysts: a retrospective cohort study.
    Zhang W, Shi H, Niu W, Sun B, Zhang Y, Wang F.
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Aug 01; 39(8):1656-1663. PubMed ID: 38852063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Opening the black box: why do euploid blastocysts fail to implant? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Cimadomo D, Rienzi L, Conforti A, Forman E, Canosa S, Innocenti F, Poli M, Hynes J, Gemmell L, Vaiarelli A, Alviggi C, Ubaldi FM, Capalbo A.
    Hum Reprod Update; 2023 Sep 05; 29(5):570-633. PubMed ID: 37192834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Does recurrent implantation failure exist? Prevalence and outcomes of five consecutive euploid blastocyst transfers in 123 987 patients.
    Gill P, Ata B, Arnanz A, Cimadomo D, Vaiarelli A, Fatemi HM, Ubaldi FM, Garcia-Velasco JA, Seli E.
    Hum Reprod; 2024 May 02; 39(5):974-980. PubMed ID: 38452358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 49.