These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

164 related items for PubMed ID: 29916335

  • 1. Common risk difference test and interval estimation of risk difference for stratified bilateral correlated data.
    Shen X, Ma CX, Yuen KC, Tian GL.
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Aug; 28(8):2418-2438. PubMed ID: 29916335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Homogeneity test of difference between two correlated proportions in stratified matched-pair studies.
    Tang NS, Zhang B, Li HQ.
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013 Aug; 23(6):1261-80. PubMed ID: 24138431
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Testing homogeneity of proportion ratios for stratified correlated bilateral data in two-arm randomized clinical trials.
    Pei Y, Tian GL, Tang ML.
    Stat Med; 2014 Nov 10; 33(25):4370-86. PubMed ID: 24974954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Risk difference tests for stratified binary data under Dallal's model.
    Sun S, Li Z, Ai M, Jiang H.
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Jun 10; 31(6):1135-1156. PubMed ID: 35758598
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Testing for linear trends in proportions using correlated otolaryngology or ophthalmology data.
    Le CT.
    Biometrics; 1988 Mar 10; 44(1):299-303. PubMed ID: 3282557
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A comparison of methods for the construction of confidence interval for relative risk in stratified matched-pair designs.
    Tang NS, Li HQ, Tang ML.
    Stat Med; 2010 Jan 15; 29(1):46-62. PubMed ID: 19856277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Statistical inference of risk difference in K correlated 2 x 2 tables with structural zero.
    Wang SF, Tang NS, Zhang B, Wang XR.
    Pharm Stat; 2009 Jan 15; 8(4):317-32. PubMed ID: 19152229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Non-inferiority test and confidence interval for the difference in correlated proportions in diagnostic procedures based on multiple raters.
    Saeki H, Tango T.
    Stat Med; 2011 Dec 10; 30(28):3313-27. PubMed ID: 21953516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.