These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

295 related items for PubMed ID: 29929689

  • 1. Distal radius fractures are difficult to classify.
    Wæver D, Madsen ML, Rölfing JHD, Borris LC, Henriksen M, Nagel LL, Thorninger R.
    Injury; 2018 Jun; 49 Suppl 1():S29-S32. PubMed ID: 29929689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Classification of distal radius fractures: an analysis of interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility.
    Andersen DJ, Blair WF, Steyers CM, Adams BD, el-Khouri GY, Brandser EA.
    J Hand Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 21(4):574-82. PubMed ID: 8842946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Distal radius fractures: consistency of the classifications].
    de Oliveira Filho OM, Belangero WD, Teles JB.
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2004 Jul; 50(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 15253028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The comparative study of reliability and reproducibility of distal radius' fracture classification among: AO frykman and Fernandez classification systems.
    Siripakarn Y, Niempoog S, Boontanapibul K.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2013 Jan; 96(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 23720978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Weber Ankle Fracture Classification System Yields Greatest Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability Over AO/OTA and Lauge-Hansen Classification Systems Under Time Constraints in an Asian Population.
    Glen LZQ, Wong JYS, Tay WX, Li TP, Phua SKA, Manohara R, Chee YH.
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2023 Jan; 62(3):505-510. PubMed ID: 36690511
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Is it time to revisit the AO classification of fractures of the distal radius? Inter- and intra-observer reliability of the AO classification.
    Plant CE, Hickson C, Hedley H, Parsons NR, Costa ML.
    Bone Joint J; 2015 Jun; 97-B(6):818-23. PubMed ID: 26033063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Classification systems for distal radius fractures.
    Kleinlugtenbelt YV, Groen SR, Ham SJ, Kloen P, Haverlag R, Simons MP, Scholtes VAB, Bhandari M, Goslings JC, Poolman RW.
    Acta Orthop; 2017 Dec; 88(6):681-687. PubMed ID: 28612669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.