These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

260 related items for PubMed ID: 29929750

  • 1. Frequency specificity of amplitude envelope patterns in noise-vocoded speech.
    Ueda K, Araki T, Nakajima Y.
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():169-181. PubMed ID: 29929750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Spectral and temporal resolutions of information-bearing acoustic changes for understanding vocoded sentences.
    Stilp CE, Goupell MJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):844-55. PubMed ID: 25698018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.
    Stilp CE.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.
    Chen F, Loizou PC.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 20081538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Sine-wave and noise-vocoded sine-wave speech in a tone language: Acoustic details matter.
    Rosen S, Hui SN.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3698-702. PubMed ID: 26723325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Perceptual weighting of the envelope and fine structure across frequency bands for sentence intelligibility: effect of interruption at the syllabic-rate and periodic-rate of speech.
    Fogerty D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):489-500. PubMed ID: 21786914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effects of low harmonics on tone identification in natural and vocoded speech.
    Liu C, Azimi B, Tahmina Q, Hu Y.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL378-84. PubMed ID: 23145698
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Pure linguistic interference during comprehension of competing speech signals.
    Dai B, McQueen JM, Hagoort P, Kösem A.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):EL249. PubMed ID: 28372048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Intelligibility of whispered speech in stationary and modulated noise maskers.
    Freyman RL, Griffin AM, Oxenham AJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2514-23. PubMed ID: 23039445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The effects of noise vocoding on speech quality perception.
    Anderson MC, Arehart KH, Kates JM.
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():75-83. PubMed ID: 24333929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA, Grant KW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Toddlers' comprehension of degraded signals: Noise-vocoded versus sine-wave analogs.
    Newman RS, Chatterjee M, Morini G, Remez RE.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):EL311-7. PubMed ID: 26428832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The effects of the addition of low-level, low-noise noise on the intelligibility of sentences processed to remove temporal envelope information.
    Hopkins K, Moore BC, Stone MA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2150-61. PubMed ID: 20968385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The role of periodicity in perceiving speech in quiet and in background noise.
    Steinmetzger K, Rosen S.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3586-99. PubMed ID: 26723315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: effect of masker type.
    Deroche ML, Culling JF.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL465-70. PubMed ID: 24181992
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Acoustic and perceptual effects of amplitude and frequency compression on high-frequency speech.
    Alexander JM, Rallapalli V.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):908. PubMed ID: 28863610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D, Ahlstrom JB, Bologna WJ, Dubno JR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.