These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

437 related items for PubMed ID: 29935769

  • 1. Endocrown restorations: Influence of dental remnant and restorative material on stress distribution.
    Tribst JPM, Dal Piva AMO, Madruga CFL, Valera MC, Borges ALS, Bresciani E, de Melo RM.
    Dent Mater; 2018 Oct; 34(10):1466-1473. PubMed ID: 29935769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Influence of Restoration Height and Masticatory Load Orientation on Ceramic Endocrowns.
    da Fonseca GF, Dal Piva AM, Tribst JP, Borges AL.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Sep 01; 19(9):1052-1057. PubMed ID: 30287703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Influence of ceramic material, thickness of restoration and cement layer on stress distribution of occlusal veneers.
    Tribst JPM, Dal Piva AMO, Penteado MM, Borges ALS, Bottino MA.
    Braz Oral Res; 2018 Nov 29; 32():e118. PubMed ID: 30517427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of cavity preparation design and ceramic type on the stress distribution, strain and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM onlays in molars.
    Vianna ALSV, Prado CJD, Bicalho AA, Pereira RADS, Neves FDD, Soares CJ.
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2018 Nov 29; 26():e20180004. PubMed ID: 30133672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars using different preparation designs and CAD/CAM materials.
    Pedrollo Lise D, Van Ende A, De Munck J, Umeda Suzuki TY, Cardoso Vieira LC, Van Meerbeek B.
    J Dent; 2017 Apr 29; 59():54-61. PubMed ID: 28214537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. New material perspective for endocrown restorations: effects on mechanical performance and fracture behavior.
    Sedrez-Porto JA, Münchow EA, Valente LL, Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T.
    Braz Oral Res; 2019 Feb 11; 33():e012. PubMed ID: 30758409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effect of Restorative Material on Mechanical Response of Provisional Endocrowns: A 3D-FEA Study.
    Tribst JPM, Borges ALS, Silva-Concílio LR, Bottino MA, Özcan M.
    Materials (Basel); 2021 Jan 31; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 33572533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of endocrowns made of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic or polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks and direct composite resin restorations: fatigue performance and stress distribution.
    Dartora G, Rocha Pereira GK, Varella de Carvalho R, Zucuni CP, Valandro LF, Cesar PF, Caldas RA, Bacchi A.
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Dec 31; 100():103401. PubMed ID: 31445400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Preparation Ferrule Design Effect on Endocrown Failure Resistance.
    Einhorn M, DuVall N, Wajdowicz M, Brewster J, Roberts H.
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan 31; 28(1):e237-e242. PubMed ID: 28985446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Influence of Adhesive Core Buildup Designs on the Resistance of Endodontically Treated Molars Restored With Lithium Disilicate CAD/CAM Crowns.
    Carvalho AO, Bruzi G, Anderson RE, Maia HP, Giannini M, Magne P.
    Oper Dent; 2016 Jan 31; 41(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 26266647
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Fracture strengths of endocrown restorations fabricated with different preparation depths and CAD/CAM materials.
    Kanat-Ertürk B, Saridağ S, Köseler E, Helvacioğlu-Yiğit D, Avcu E, Yildiran-Avcu Y.
    Dent Mater J; 2018 Mar 30; 37(2):256-265. PubMed ID: 29311428
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Influence of remaining tooth structure and restorative material type on stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars: A finite element analysis.
    Zhu J, Rong Q, Wang X, Gao X.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May 30; 117(5):646-655. PubMed ID: 27881319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Restoration of severely damaged endodontically treated premolars: The influence of the endo-core length on marginal integrity and fatigue resistance of lithium disilicate CAD-CAM ceramic endocrowns.
    Rocca GT, Daher R, Saratti CM, Sedlacek R, Suchy T, Feilzer AJ, Krejci I.
    J Dent; 2018 Jan 30; 68():41-50. PubMed ID: 29107134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effect of temperature and humidity on post-gel shrinkage, cusp deformation, bond strength and shrinkage stress - Construction of a chamber to simulate the oral environment.
    Bicalho AA, de Souza SJ, de Rosatto CM, Tantbirojn D, Versluis A, Soares CJ.
    Dent Mater; 2015 Dec 30; 31(12):1523-32. PubMed ID: 26518338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Full-Crown Versus Endocrown Approach: A 3D-Analysis of Both Restorations and the Effect of Ferrule and Restoration Material.
    Tribst JPM, Dal Piva AMO, de Jager N, Bottino MA, de Kok P, Kleverlaan CJ.
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Apr 30; 30(4):335-344. PubMed ID: 32856743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Strength comparison of anterior teeth restored with ceramic endocrowns vs custom-made post and cores.
    Dejak B, Młotkowski A.
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Apr 30; 62(2):171-176. PubMed ID: 28886951
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.