These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

123 related items for PubMed ID: 29938411

  • 1. Comparison Of Frequency Of Post Operative Sensitivity In Amalgam Restorations Using Copal Varnish And Dentin Adhesive Liner.
    Saba K, Maxood A, Abdullah S, Riaz A, Din SU.
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2018; 30(2):163-166. PubMed ID: 29938411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Dentin adhesive superior to copal varnish in preventing microleakage in primary teeth.
    Royse MC, Ott NW, Mathieu GP.
    Pediatr Dent; 1996; 18(7):440-3. PubMed ID: 8970205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of different liner treatments on postoperative sensitivity of amalgam restorations.
    Gordan VV, Mjör IA, Hucke RD, Smith GE.
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Jan; 30(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 10323159
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of a resin-based desensitizing agent and a self-etching dentin adhesive on marginal leakage of amalgam restorations.
    Ghavamnasiri M, Alavi M, Alavi S.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Nov 01; 8(7):54-61. PubMed ID: 17994155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Short-term clinical evaluation of post-operative sensitivity with bonded amalgams.
    Kennington LB, Davis RD, Murchison DF, Langenderfer WR.
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug 01; 11(4):177-80. PubMed ID: 10388372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M, Theodoridou-Pahini S, Papadogiannis Y, Karezis A.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Aug 01; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effect of pulp protection technique on the clinical performance of amalgam restorations: three-year results.
    Baratieri LN, Machado A, Van Noort R, Ritter AV, Baratieri NM.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Aug 01; 27(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 12120767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.
    da Silva AF, Piva E, Demarco FF, Correr Sobrinho L, Osinga PW.
    Oper Dent; 2006 Aug 01; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Microleakage of a dental amalgam alloy bonding agent.
    Saiku JM, St Germain HA, Meiers JC.
    Oper Dent; 1993 Aug 01; 18(5):172-8. PubMed ID: 8152986
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Amalgam restorations: postoperative sensitivity as a function of liner treatment and cavity depth.
    Gordan VV, Mjör IA, Moorhead JE.
    Oper Dent; 1999 Aug 01; 24(6):377-83. PubMed ID: 10823088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS, Liu CC, Cheng MR, Lin CP.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Aug 01; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of a copal varnish, ZOE or glass ionomer cement bases on microleakage of amalgam restorations.
    Manders CA, Garcia-Godoy F, Barnwell GM.
    Am J Dent; 1990 Apr 01; 3(2):63-6. PubMed ID: 2076225
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Fatigue of resin-bonded amalgam restorations.
    Bonilla E, White SN.
    Oper Dent; 1996 Apr 01; 21(3):122-6. PubMed ID: 9011846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of a resin-based desensitizing agent and a self-etching adhesive on the reduction of postoperative sensitivity of amalgam restorations.
    Hajizadeh H, Akbari M, Ghavamnasiri M, Abedini S.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov 01; 9(7):9-16. PubMed ID: 18997911
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage.
    Marchiori S, Baratieri LN, de Andrada MA, Monteiro Júnior S, Ritter AV.
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct 01; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Long-term use of dentine adhesive as an interfacial sealer under Class II amalgam restorations.
    Ben-Amar A, Liberman R, Judes H, Nordenberg D.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1990 Jan 01; 17(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 2405127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A comparison of amalgam microleakage with a 4-META liner and copal varnish.
    Moore DS, Johnson WW, Kaplan I.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995 Jan 01; 8(5):461-6. PubMed ID: 8595104
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL, Evans DB, Maxson BB.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Jan 01; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Clinical performance of bonded amalgam restorations at 42 months.
    Browning WD, Johnson WW, Gregory PN.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 May 01; 131(5):607-11. PubMed ID: 10832254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations.
    Alptekin T, Ozer F, Unlu N, Cobanoglu N, Blatz MB.
    Oper Dent; 2010 May 01; 35(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 21180003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.