These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

286 related items for PubMed ID: 29946954

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Pesticide analysis in teas and chamomile by liquid chromatography and gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry using a modified QuEChERS method: validation and pilot survey in real samples.
    Lozano A, Rajski Ł, Belmonte-Valles N, Uclés A, Uclés S, Mezcua M, Fernández-Alba AR.
    J Chromatogr A; 2012 Dec 14; 1268():109-22. PubMed ID: 23127810
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Application of zirconium dioxide nanoparticle sorbent for the clean-up step in post-harvest pesticide residue analysis.
    Uclés A, Herrera López S, Dolores Hernando M, Rosal R, Ferrer C, Fernández-Alba AR.
    Talanta; 2015 Nov 01; 144():51-61. PubMed ID: 26452791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A sensitive and efficient method for routine pesticide multiresidue analysis in bee pollen samples using gas and liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry.
    Vázquez PP, Lozano A, Uclés S, Ramos MM, Fernández-Alba AR.
    J Chromatogr A; 2015 Dec 24; 1426():161-73. PubMed ID: 26654830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of Two Methods for the Determination of Selected Pesticides in Honey and Honeybee Samples.
    Bargańska Ż, Konieczka P, Namieśnik J.
    Molecules; 2018 Oct 09; 23(10):. PubMed ID: 30304845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Multifamily determination of pesticide residues in soya-based nutraceutical products by GC/MS-MS.
    Páleníková A, Martínez-Domínguez G, Arrebola FJ, Romero-González R, Hrouzková S, Frenich AG.
    Food Chem; 2015 Apr 15; 173():796-807. PubMed ID: 25466092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Determination of selected environmental contaminants in foraging honeybees.
    García-Valcárcel AI, Molero E, Tadeo JL, Hernando MD.
    Talanta; 2016 Apr 15; 148():1-6. PubMed ID: 26653416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Multiple pesticide residues in live and poisoned honeybees - Preliminary exposure assessment.
    Kiljanek T, Niewiadowska A, Gaweł M, Semeniuk S, Borzęcka M, Posyniak A, Pohorecka K.
    Chemosphere; 2017 May 15; 175():36-44. PubMed ID: 28211333
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Determination of 60 pesticides in hen eggs using the QuEChERS procedure followed by LC-MS/MS and GC-MS/MS.
    Song NE, Lee JY, Mansur AR, Jang HW, Lim MC, Lee Y, Yoo M, Nam TG.
    Food Chem; 2019 Nov 15; 298():125050. PubMed ID: 31260955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Influence of QuEChERS modifications on recovery and matrix effect during the multi-residue pesticide analysis in soil by GC/MS/MS and GC/ECD/NPD.
    Łozowicka B, Rutkowska E, Jankowska M.
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Mar 15; 24(8):7124-7138. PubMed ID: 28093672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.